Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Civil Procedure » Page 26

DOCUMENTS, CIVIL EVIDENCE AND WITNESS STATEMENTS: SERVE PROPER NOTICES OR YOU COULD BE ON YOUR BIKE

January 21, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of His Honour Allan Gore QC (sitting as a High Court judge) in Edwards -v- London Borough of Sutton [2014] EWHC 4378 QB contains some important observations about documents, Civil Evidence Act notices and witness statements. THE CASE…

GORDON RAMSAY CASE AND WITNESS EVIDENCE: ABSENCE OF KEY WITNESSES DOES NOT LEAD TO TURNING UP OF THE HEAT

January 21, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The case of Gordon Ramsay -v- Gary Love [2015] EWHC 65 (Ch) has had much attention in the media, primarily because of the identity of the claimant. However the judge made important observations as to the inferences that can be…

JUDGE – CAN YOU CHANGE YOUR MIND PLEASE? THE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH A JUDGE CAN REVIEW THEIR OWN DECISION

January 12, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In Altus Group (UK) Limited -v- Baker Tilly [2015] EWHC 12 (Ch) HH Judge Keyser QC reviewed the circumstances in which a judge can change their mind after sending out a draft judgment. THE CASE The claimant brought an action…

BEWARE THE EXPERT WHO "LECTURES" THE COURT (AND TELLS THE JUDGE WHO TO BELIEVE)

January 6, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In Walls -v- London Eastern Railway Ltd (N Wilkinson QC) 05/12/2014* the judge found that the claimant’s continuing back pain was caused by a long-standing degenerative spinal condition rather than an accident. THE JUDGE’S COMMENTARY ON THE EXPERT EVIDENCE One…

CIVIL CASE OF THE YEAR: AA -v- LBS: DAVID -v- GOLIATH?

December 29, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Witness statements

There were only a few comments when I asked, on twitter, for recommendations for the civil case of the year.  I have overlooked the obvious candidate (Denton)and gone for a case that can, and should, reinvigorate belief in the civil…

ADDITIONAL PARTIES CANNOT BE ADDED IF THERE IS NO CONNECTION TO CURRENT ACTION: THE ABC OF XYZ

December 4, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In the latest decision in the XYZ case [2014] EWHC 4056 (QB) Mrs Justice Thirlwall DBE rejected an application that the insurers of the defendants be joined into the action.  There was no real connection between the issues in the…

A JUDGE SHOULD RARELY RECUSE THEMSELVES: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION IN OTKRITIE CONSIDERED

October 14, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In Otkritie International Investment -v- Mr George Urumov [2014] EWCA Civ 1315 decided today the Court of Appeal reviewed the circumstances in which a judge should recuse themselves for bias. It is clear that this cannot be done lightly. In…

INVOLUNTARY BAILMENT AND CIVIL PROCEDURE: CAMPBELL -v- REDSTONE CONSIDERED

October 2, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Liability, Members Content, Risks of litigation

The law as to bailment sometimes raises its head in civil procedure. It is relevant for instance when someone damages a car which is borrowed. It is more significant in relation to the duties owed in relation to goods left…

MORE ON WITNESS CREDIBILITY: McIntyre & HENNESSY -v- THE HOME OFFICE

October 1, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

We have looked at issues of witness credibility many times before. It is often the key issue when a matter reaches trial. A graphic example of credibility issues can be found in the judgment of Mr Justice Mostyn in McIntyre…

LIMITATION IN A BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM: DATE OF ACCRUAL; LATENT DAMAGE AND AMENDING UNDER CPR 17.4.(2): A CASE IN POINT

September 14, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Limitation, Members Content, Statements of Case

In Interface Europe Ltd -v- Premier Hanks Dyers Ltd [2014] EWHC 2610 (QB) Judge Saffman (sitting as a judge of the High Court) considered the issue of the relevant date of accrual of a cause of action in a breach…

E-BUNDLES COMING TO THE SUPREME COURT AND PRIVY COUNCIL VERY, VERY SOON

September 8, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links

The Supreme Court  has issued guidance on the use of electronic bundles which will be mandatory for a trial period. Parties given permission to appeal in the Supreme Court and Privy Council after the 1st October 2014 will be expected…

DENTON APPLIED IN THE TAX & CHANCERY CHAMBER: LEEDS -v- COMMISSIONERS CONSIDERED

August 14, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

One of the places where Mitchell, and subsequently Denton, had a major impact was the specialist tribunals. As we have seen in this blog Mitchell principles were applied with some vigour and the “clarification” by Denton has also had an effect….

SECOND ACTION AFTER SETTLEMENT NOT AN ABUSE OF PROCESS: SECTION 33 APPLICATION ALLOWED: DOWDALL CONSIDERED IN DETAIL

August 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Limitation, Members Content, Second set of proceedings

The case of Dowdall -v- William Kenyon & Sons Ltd [2014] EWHC 2822 (QB) decided yesterday contains some important observations in relation to allegations of abuse of process; estoppel and section 33. THE FACTS Mr Dowdall has pleural mesotheliomia. In 2003…

CIVIL EVIDENCE: WITNESS STATEMENTS: PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF AN ORAL CONTRACT

August 6, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

I have written before about witness evidence and the difficulties in establishing matters without the benefit of corroboration.  The case of Brogden & Reid -v- Investec Bank Ltd [2014] EWHC 2785 (Comm) reported today illustrates this problem. THE ISSUES: WAS THERE AN…

LEEDS LAW SOCIETY MEET THE JUDGES EVENT: JACKSON ONE YEAR (AND A FEW MONTHS) ON

LEEDS LAW SOCIETY MEET THE JUDGES EVENT: JACKSON ONE YEAR (AND A FEW MONTHS) ON

June 18, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Risks of litigation, Striking out, Uncategorized

Yesterday evening Leeds Law Society held a “meet the judges” evening when practitioners met local judges and court staff to discuss issues arising out of the implementation of the Jackson reforms.   Some of the issues were specific to Leeds but most…

WITNESS STATEMENTS: NOT ONE BUT TWO "ESSENTIAL CHECKLISTS"

May 28, 2014 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Serving documents, Witness statements

Earlier posts have documented how these checklists were made.  The prequel to the essential checklist sets out matters that practitioners have to watch.  Here I set out the checklist prepared by the group “Stating the Obvious”.   It is no…

SERVICE OF PROCEEDINGS: ADDING TO THE "ESSENTIAL CHECKLIST"

May 22, 2014 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form

One advantage of twitter is that it is instantaneous.  Tweeters today commented on the new practice at Salford of only sending one copy of the sealed claim form back for solicitor service.  This is something that can usefully be added…

STANDING UP FOR COURT STAFF: WE ARE ON THE SAME SIDE AND CAN'T LIVE WITHOUT THEM

May 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content

I have, several times, commented on the strange decisions that appear to be being made by court staff carrying out administrative functions.  However one of the major challenges for all those involved in the litigation process is going to be…

SIR JACK JACOB QC AND THE FABRIC OF ENGLISH CIVIL JUSTICE: LESSONS FOR TODAY?

April 11, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Uncategorized

With the speed in which modern litigation is conducted it is often difficult to pause and reflect, let alone look back to assess whether experts from the past can assist.  For some time I have been looking for a copy…

DRAFTING WITNESS STATEMENTS : THE QUESTIONS YOU ASK WILL DETERMINE THE ANSWERS YOU GET: EIGHT CRUCIAL POINTS ON EVIDENCE

January 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

Earlier posts on witness statements have dealt with the manner of drafting and presentation. However one overlooked aspect is the way that witnesses are questioned.  The questions asked, and the way questions are asked, will determine the evidence that goes…

MORE ON LEGAL WRITING: STRAIGHT FROM THE BENCH

January 9, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Written advocacy

The earlier post on written advocacy has led me to a blog written by an American Judge. The blog “Hercules and the Empire” is written by Federal Judge Richard Kopf  and has proven to be popular in America (425,000 page…

DO YOU HAVE TO FILE FORM H IN PART 8 PROCEEDINGS? SOMETHING YOU SHOULD BE SURE ABOUT

November 20, 2013 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

 All litigators know (or should know) the central importance of Form H in civil procedure. If you don’t file the form in time then you don’t get paid. A colleague today asked me whether it was necessary to file a…

LITIGATION AFTER JACKSON: A 10 POINT SURVIVAL GUIDE

August 23, 2013 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Limitation, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Witness statements

There has been a tremendous change in policy in relation to case management after 1st April 2013.  This has already led to major difficulties for some litigators. This post is the first (of what may be many)  survival guides for…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: FURTHER TRAPS FOR THE UNWARY

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: FURTHER TRAPS FOR THE UNWARY

July 3, 2013 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form

The post on “Service Faults” http://civillitigationbrief.wordpress.com/2013/07/01/service-faults-and-the-match-is-over/  pointed out one of the traps for the unwary in relation to service of the claim form.  However the decision in Bethell Construction –v- Deloitte & Touche [2010] EWHC (Judge Ho… Enjoying this post? Become…

ONE DIRECTION SINGING FROM THE SAME HYMN SHEET ?

ONE DIRECTION SINGING FROM THE SAME HYMN SHEET ?

June 28, 2013 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content

THE USE OF STANDARD DIRECTIONS   I have put the standard directions as a link because they will normally be the first port of call for anyone drafting directions (and I once spent a frustrating half hour trying to find…

← Previous 1 … 25 26

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 77: CASE STRUCK OUT: THERE WAS “INSUFFICIENT PLEADINGS OF FACT FROM WHICH IT COULD BE INFERRED THAT ANY OF THE ALLEGATIONS HAVE A REAL PROSPET OF SUCCESS”
  • SERVICE POINTS 44: LOCAL AUTHORITY FAILS TO SERVE PROPERLY ON INTERESTED PARTIES TO PROPOSED APPEAL: THE WHOLE APPEAL FAILS
  • WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: TIPS FOR TESTIFYING IN COURT: FROM THE UNITED STATE’S ATTORNEY’S OFFICE (MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA)
  • SERVICE POINTS 43: WHY CPR 6.15 IS NOT THE “CAVALRY” COMING OVER THE HILL TO SAVE YOU IF THE CLAIM FORM HAS NOT BEEN SERVED PROPERLY
  • SERVICE POINTS 42: A £82 MILLION POUND FAILS BECAUSE THE CLAIM FORM WAS SENT BY EMAIL TO SOLICITORS WHO HAD NOT STATED THAT THEY WOULD ACCEPT SERVICE: AN OLD ISSUE (AND A BIG ONE)

Top Posts

  • A FIRM OF SOLICITORS ISSUED PROCEEDINGS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO DO SO: ORDERED TO PAY £900,000 ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS: SOME EXPENSIVE LESSONS HERE...
  • COST BITES 386: THREATS TO REPORT THE DEFENDANTS' SOLICITORS TO THE SRA WAS ONE OF THE REASONS THE CLAIMANT HAD TO PAY COSTS ON AN INDEMNITY BASIS: WEAPONISERS BEWARE
  • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE CITATION OF MISLEADING AUTHORITIES: ANOTHER WEEK, ANOTHER CASE: IF YOUR NAME IS ON THE DOCUMENT YOU "OWN" IT...
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: LAWYERS FAILURE TO PROVIDE OVERSIGHT OF EXPERTS LEADS TO EXCLUSION OF THEIR EVIDENCE: EXPERT EVIDENCE IS “NOT A MATTER OF RIGHT” (MAY 2021)
  • COST BITES 385: THE COURTS SHOULD BE WARY OF DECIDING PRELIMINARY APPLICATIONS AND ISSUES ON A PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENT: THIS COULD UNDERMINE THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF THE REGIME

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.