Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Witness statement » Page 9

"WITNESS TRAINING" DOES IT DO ANY GOOD? THE ROLE OF THE SOLICITOR IN DRAFTING WITNESS STATEMENTS

November 12, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In Globe Motors portugal-Material Electrico Para A Industria Automvel LDA -v- TRW Lucas Varity Electric Steering Ltd [2014] EWHC 3718 QB HH Judge Mackie QC considered witness evidence of routine business transactions that took place over a decade before. He…

EVIDENCE, EXPERTS & ARSON: ANALYSING THE EVIDENCE WHEN SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS ARE MADE IN A CIVIL CASE

November 11, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Expert evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The decision of H.H. Judge Mackie Q.C. in Geneisuj.Net Limited -v- Allianz Insurance Limited [2014] EWHC 3676 (QB) provides an object lesson in the analysis of evidence in a case where serious allegations were being made. THE ISSUES The claimant…

APPEALING ON THE FACTS AND WITNESS CREDIBILITY: THE DEMEANOUR OF THE WITNESS

November 9, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

Earlier posts have considered issues relating to witness statements and witness credibility. In particular the difficulties of appealing findings of fact. A helpful summary of the principles relating to appealing when a judge has made a finding in relation to…

WITNESSES: YOU ARE IN REAL TROUBLE IF YOU SAY ONE THING IN ONE WITNESS STATEMENT AND A DIFFERENT THING IN ANOTHER

November 7, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

We have  looked at issues relating to witness credibility several times recently. However further apposite examples arise in the decision of Sales J in Avonwick Holdings Ltd -v- Webinvest & Shlosberg [2014] EWHC 3661 (Ch). In particular the major (and obvious) difficulties…

WITNESS CREDIBILITY; DOCUMENTS; RECOLLECTION AND PLAYING AWAY FROM HOME WHEN THERE ARE MILLIONS AT STAKE

November 6, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

Earlier posts have looked at the issue of witness credibility in the context of civil trials.  Here we look at the issue of witness evidence in the context of a multi million pound dispute between corporations. The judgment, given earlier…

WHICH WITNESS IS GOING TO BE BELIEVED? A HIGH COURT DECISION ASSESSING THE CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES

November 6, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

It is essential that litigators have a keen understanding of how witness evidence is likely to be assessed at trial.  Many trials take place precisely because there is a conflict of evidence between the witnesses.  An example of a close…

MITCHELL: THE CASE THAT KEEPS ON GIVING: EXPERT EVIDENCE; SIMILAR FACT EVIDENCE AND THE EDITING OF WITNESS STATEMENTS

November 2, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Expert evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

Regular readers of this blog will need no introduction to the procedural issues that Mitchell -v- News Group Newspapers Ltd has given rise to already.  Procedural issues have arisen again and were considered by Mr Justice Warby (2014 EWHC 3590…

THAT WITNESS STATEMENT I SIGNED: IT'S JUST NOT TRUE

October 31, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

There is an interesting discussion of witness evidence in the judgment of Mr Justice Eder in Austen -v- Pearl Motor Yachts Ltd [2014] EWHC 3544 (Comm). The case was opened on the basis that certain key facts in a witness…

ADJOURNMENT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING TO ARGUE NOVATION? NO VAY

October 28, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In A.T. Stannard Ltd -v- James Tobutt and Thomas Tobutt  [2014] EWHC 3491 (TCC) Mr Justice Akenhead refused an application for the adjournment of a hearing for summary judgment to allow the defendants to, belatedly, argue novation of a contract. THE…

ASSESSING THE RELIABILITY OF WITNESSES: HOW DOES THE JUDGE DECIDE? ANOTHER EXAMPLE

October 26, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

There have been several posts on this blog about the way in which a civil judge assesses the reliability of witnesses.  A further example can be seen in the judgement of Stephen Smith Q.C., sitting as a High Court judge,…

EVIDENCE: PROVING DAMAGES AND INTEREST ON DAMAGES: YOU CAN'T SUGAR THE PILL AND HAVE TO PROVE THE LOSS

October 21, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Damages, Members Content, Written advocacy

The final paragraphs of the judgment of Mr Justice Eder in Sugar Hut Group -v- AJ Insurance [2014] EWHC  3352 (Comm) has some important lessons on the need to adduce evidence to prove losses. It also contains a discussion of…

IRRELEVANT EVIDENCE, INFERENCES AND "FORGERY": EVIDENTIAL ISSUES IN A HIGH COURT CASE

October 19, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The decision of Mr Justice Norris in Redstone Mortgages Ltd -v- B Legal Ltd [2014]EWHC 3390 (Ch) deals with several important issues relating to evidence in civil cases. In particular the relevance and admissibility of “quasi expert” evidence and the…

WHY A SOLICITOR SHOULD NOT MAKE STATEMENTS ON CONTENTIOUS MATTERS

October 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

When is it appropriate for a solicitor to swear an affidavit or make a statement in place of the client? This issue was considered by Stanley Burnton J in Bracken Partners -v- Gutteridge [2001] EWHC 568 (Ch) THE CASE The…

FAILING TO TURN UP TO HEARINGS AND SERVING WITNESS STATEMENTS LATE: AN EXAMPLE OF THE DISCRETION BEING EXERCISED: RELIEF GRANTED UPON CONDITION THAT DEFAULTING PARTY PAYS COSTS AND PAYS £25,000 INTO COURT

October 16, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The question of relief from sanctions after witness statements were served late has been discussed several times on this blog.  The issue was considered by HH Judge Mackie QC  in Carlton Advisers -v- Dorchester Holdings Ltd [2014] EWHC 3341 (Comm)….

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CREDIBILITY: THE COURT OF APPEAL WILL RARELY INTERFERE

October 16, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Disclosure, Members Content, Witness statements

The decision of the Court of Appeal today  in Exsus Travel Ltd -v- James Turner [2014] EWCA Civ 1331 reinforces the points made in earlier posts about the reluctance of the Court of Appeal to interfere with findings of fact…

THE ROLE OF THE APPELLATE COURT IN CONSIDERING FINDINGS OF FACT

October 15, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In Clydesdale Bank -v- Duffy [2014] EWCA Civ 1260 the Court of Appeal set out a clear statement of the limited role of the appeal court in considering appeals in relation to findings of fact by the trial judge. THE…

LIES, EVIDENCE, DISCLOSURE AND PROCEDURE : AA -v- LONDON BOROUGH OF SOUTHWARK CONSIDERED

October 14, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Liability, Members Content, Statements of Case, Witness statements

It is certain that the decision in AA -v- London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 QB will receive considerable coverage. It is a remarkable case. There are enormous implications for local authorities. Here we look at the procedural issues in…

PUTTING "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" ON LETTERS DOES NOT NECESSARILY MAKE THEM PRIVILEGED: AVONWICK -v- WEBINVEST CONSIDERED

October 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

Putting “without prejudice” on inter partes correspondence does not mean that the court will not look at them. This issue was considered by Mr Justice David Richards in Avonwick -v-Webinvest [2014] EWHC 3322 (Ch). The case also contains a short…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS, VERY LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS AND DOCUMENTS: A DECISION TODAY

October 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Statements of Case, Witness statements

The judgment of the Hon Mrs Justice Asplin DBE given today in Lictor Anstalt -v- MIR Steel UK Ltd [2014] EWHC 3316 (Ch) contained a consideration of the Denton criteria in relation to late service of witness evidence and documents….

TRIAL PREPARATION, BUNDLES & WITNESS STATEMENTS: THE JUDGE'S LAMENT

October 12, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links, Witness statements, Written advocacy

The earlier post on the decision in Weathford -v- Hydropath  concentrated upon the application for a non-party costs order.  However in the primary judgment on liability the judge made some all too common criticisms in relation to trial preparation, skeleton…

ROBUST DECISIONS, CASE MANAGEMENT AND WITNESS EVIDENCE: AVOIDING REVERSE MACROCOSM

October 11, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

In Tindall Cobham 1 Ltd -v- Adda Hotel  [2014] EWHC 2637 (Ch) Peter Smith J made robust orders to ensure that an application would be heard within days rather than months.  He also made some telling observations in relation to…

THE CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES; JOINT MEETINGS AND OVERREACHING EXPERTS: A CASE TO POINT

October 6, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of Mr Justice Dingemans in Garcia -v- Associated Newspapers Ltd [2014] EWHC 3137 is a defamation action. It contains some interesting examples of evidential issues and problems. Firstly relating to the assessment of witnesses; secondly in relation to…

INVOLUNTARY BAILMENT AND CIVIL PROCEDURE: CAMPBELL -v- REDSTONE CONSIDERED

October 2, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Liability, Members Content, Risks of litigation

The law as to bailment sometimes raises its head in civil procedure. It is relevant for instance when someone damages a car which is borrowed. It is more significant in relation to the duties owed in relation to goods left…

MORE ON WITNESS CREDIBILITY: McIntyre & HENNESSY -v- THE HOME OFFICE

October 1, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

We have looked at issues of witness credibility many times before. It is often the key issue when a matter reaches trial. A graphic example of credibility issues can be found in the judgment of Mr Justice Mostyn in McIntyre…

WITNESS STATEMENTS IN FOREIGN LANGUAGES: THE APPROPRIATE PROCEDURE

September 29, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

If a witness cannot speak English and a witness statement is required what needs to be done? Some guidance can be found in the rules and in a recent case in the Family Division. GUIDANCE IN PRACTICE DIRECTION 32 23.2…

THE WITNESSES SAY THE OTHER SIDE IS LYING: WHAT DOES THE JUDGE DO? A GORGEOUS BEAUTY CONSIDERED!

September 23, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

We have looked before at issues of witness credibility, particularly in relation to the drafting of witness statements. This was an issue considered by Arnold J in Gorgeous Beauty Ltd -v- Liu (and others) [2014] EWHC 2952 (Ch). It provides…

INDEMNITY COSTS, COSTS BUDGETING AND WITNESS STATEMENTS:INTERVIEW ON KELLIE -v- LLOYD

September 18, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Useful links, Witness statements

There is a feature on the Lexis Nexis Dispute Resolution Blog where I answer questions about the implications of the judgment in Kellie and another v Wheatley & Lloyd Architects Ltd [2014] EWHC 2886 (TCC), [2014] All ER (D) 152 (Aug)…

CORONER'S HEARINGS AND THE USE OF HEARSAY EVIDENCE

September 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content

The Chief Coroner has issued a Law Sheet on the use of Hearsay Evidence in Coroner’s Courts.  It is available here THE KEY POINTS Hearsay evidence is admissible in coroner’s courts. Once it is admitted its value is a matter…

TAKING EVIDENCE; WITNESS STATEMENTS AND NOT MISLEADING THE COURT: BRETT -v- THE SRA CONSIDERED

September 11, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

The question of the duties owed by a lawyer to not mislead the court was at the forefront of the decision yesterday in Brett -v- The Solicitors Regulatory Authority [2014] EWHC 2974 (Admin).  This case has obvious and very wide…

MATTERS LEADING UP TO THE MAKING OF A WITNESS STATEMENT MAY NOT NECESSARILY HAVE JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS IMMUNITY: COULD YOU BE CROSS-EXAMINED ON THE WAY YOU TOOK A WITNESS STATEMENT?

September 7, 2014 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

Statements made in the course of proceedings are usually subject to judicial proceedings immunity.  The scope and extent of this immunity was considered in detail by the Court of Appeal in Singh -v- Governing Body of Moorlands Primary School [2013]…

DURRANT CASE BACK IN THE REPORTS: WHAT PRESUMPTIONS SHOULD A JUDGE DRAW WHEN A PARTY IS DEBARRED FROM CALLING WITNESSES?

September 1, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The case of Durrant  -v- Chief Constable of Avon & Somerset Constabulary [2013]  EWCA Civ 1264 was well known as one of the first reports on sanctions. The defendant police authority was debarred from calling witness evidence as a result…

A WORKING EXAMPLE OF THE DANGERS OF NOT TAKING A FULL WITNESS STATEMENT: DISASTER CAN STRIKE

August 29, 2014 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The decision of Judge Keyser Q.C. In Kellie & Kellie -v- Wheatley & Lloyd Architects Ltd [2014] EWHC 2866(TCC)  gives a working example of the dangers of not taking a full witness statement and exploring issues of importance with a…

DRAFTING WITNESS STATEMENTS: GUIDANCE FROM DOWN UNDER

August 27, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Useful links, Witness statements

Recent posts have given rise to a international tour searching out guidance for the preparation and drafting of witness statements. We have been to Scotland, and to the East, and now we arrive in Australia where the Western Australian Bar…

WITNESS STATEMENTS AND COMPLYING WITH THE RULES: WHY WITNESS STATEMENTS CAN COME TO GRIEF

August 24, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

The case of Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander Ltd (in administration) v. UBS AG [2014] EWHC 2450 (Comm) contains yet another example of the very real dangers of using a witness statement to argue a case.  It is usually unhelpful and often…

WITNESS STATEMENTS; WITNESSES; EVIDENCE AND PSYCHOLOGY: GUIDANCE FROM THE EAST

August 22, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The post yesterday looked at guidance on taking witness statements from Scottish Judges. Here we look at a real gem of an article by Ula Cartwright-Finch and Alex Waksman of Herbert Smith Freehills on the accuracy of witness statements and…

THE PROCESS OF TAKING WITNESS STATEMENTS: GUIDANCE FROM ACROSS THE BORDER

August 21, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

There is relatively little guidance to litigators on the process of taking witness statements. What are appropriate questions and, to what extent, can the witness be “guided” by the lawyer.  These are difficult and sensitive topics which have been considered…

CIVIL EVIDENCE AND WITNESS STATEMENTS – HERE’S THE CATCH: THE JUDGE CAN ACCEPT SOME OF THE EVIDENCE SOME OF THE TIME

August 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

There have been several posts on this blog in relation to witness evidence and witness credibility.  One important point to note is that a judge is entitled to find that a witness is correct on some matters and not on…

CIVIL EVIDENCE: WITNESS STATEMENTS: PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF AN ORAL CONTRACT

August 6, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

I have written before about witness evidence and the difficulties in establishing matters without the benefit of corroboration.  The case of Brogden & Reid -v- Investec Bank Ltd [2014] EWHC 2785 (Comm) reported today illustrates this problem. THE ISSUES: WAS THERE AN…

DRAFTING WITNESS STATEMENTS: "4 GOLDEN RULES" DIRECTLY FROM THE JUDGES WHO HEAR THE CASES

July 28, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

 I have recommended before that litigators read the guidance for litigants in person. It provides useful insights for most litigators and covers most aspects of civil procedure. It is written by six Circuit Judges so it can be safely assumed…

LITIGATION AFTER JACKSON (POST DENTON EDITION): 12 POINT SURVIVAL GUIDE

July 26, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Part 36, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Useful links, Witness statements

In August last year I wrote Litigation after Jackson a  10 point Survival Guide.  All of the points made in that post remain valid. I have added another 2 to deal with the situation post -Denton. The biggest danger, post…

WHAT IS MEANT BY "SERIOUS AND SIGNIFICANT"? THE COURT CONCENTRATES MUCH MORE UPON THE EFFECT OF THE BREACH RATHER THAN THE BREACH ITSELF

July 18, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Denton -v- White;  [2014] EWCA Civ 906. the Court of Appeal eschewed the use of the word “trivial” where a court is considering an application for relief from sanctions.  Instead the Court stated that the focus should be on whether…

"MISAPPLICATION OF THE WORD SANCTION": EXTENDING TIME ON A CONSENT ORDER IS NOT AN APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: SERVICE -v- BEACKON CONSIDERED

June 29, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Second set of proceedings

The case of Service Insurance Company Ltd -v- Beackon is briefly reported on Lawtel on the 26th June 2014.   It is a High Court decision by Andrews J where he rejected an appeal by an insurance company against an…

WITNESS STATEMENTS ARE FOR FACTS: KNOWING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EVIDENCE AND SUBMISSIONS (AND WHY IT MATTERS)

June 26, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The recent Leeds Law Society Civil Litigation event reminded me of a similar meeting with judges over 25 years ago.  The Registrars (District Judges) gave a talk to local articled clerks (trainee solicitors). There was a basic message delivered in…

WITNESS STATEMENTS CANNOT BE RELIED ON AT TRIAL IF SERVED LATE AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS NOT GIVEN

June 25, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

Lawtel today reported the case of Davies -v- Liberty Place [2014] EWHC 2034 (Admin). In that case Leggatt J stated that a party who served a witness statement late was not automatically precluded from relying on that statement at trial….

GIVING EVIDENCE CAN BE A GRIZZLY BUSINESS: HOW DO THE COURTS ASSESS WHOSE ACCOUNT IS CORRECT?

GIVING EVIDENCE CAN BE A GRIZZLY BUSINESS: HOW DO THE COURTS ASSESS WHOSE ACCOUNT IS CORRECT?

June 22, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Risks of litigation, Witness statements

In Grizzly Business Ltd -v- Stena Drilling Ltd [2014] EWHC 1920 (Comm) a judge had to decide between two competing versions of what was said in a telephone call three years earlier in a case when $2.5 million was at…

ANOTHER CASE WHERE PARTY REFUSED RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENT

June 21, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

The case of Swinden -v- Grima (Nicol J) 18/06/2014 is briefly reported on Lawtel (20th June). It is another example of the court refusing permission to serve witness statements late. THE FACTS The defendant served a witness statement on the…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING LATE FAILURE TO SERVE WITNESS STATEMENT: ONE OUT OF THREE MAY NOT BE ENOUGH

June 18, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

In Cranford Community College -v- Cranford College Ltd (16/06/2014 IPEC Judge Hacon) the court granted relief from sanctions following late service of a witness statement. (The case was reported on Lawtel on the 18th June 2014). THE FACTS The action…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED AFTER LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS SUMMARY: HIGH COURT CASE CONSIDERED

June 17, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

Whilst the Court of Appeal ruminates over the problems caused by Mitchell life goes on at the procedural coalface. Attached to this post is a decision of Mr. N. Strauss Q.C. sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge on the…

COURT OF APPEAL HEARING TODAY: DETAILED NOTE OF SUBMISSIONS AND DISCUSSIONS AT THE COURT

June 16, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The Court of Appeal hearing on sanctions after Mitchell goes on.   Here I outline, in detail, the submissions and discussions in Denton.  Other cases will follow. DENTON AND OTHERS V T H WHITE LIMITED  Heard by the Court of…

SANCTIONS CASES: SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS THIS MORNING

June 16, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

Here is a very brief summary of the arguments considered by the Court of Appeal in the cases on sanctions this morning.   A useful summary is also being provided by @JohnHyde1982 on twitter. Lord Justices Jackson, Dyson and Voss are…

← Previous 1 … 8 9 10 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • SERVICE POINTS 37 : IS SERVICE ON A P.0. BOX GOOD SERVICE? (OH – AND BY THE WAY – AS IT TURNS OUT – THE CLAIM FORM WAS NEVER, IN FACT, SERVED AT ALL): A BIT OF A SURPRISE FOR THE CLAIMANT AT THE APPEAL STAGE
  • WHAT TO DO IF THE DEFENDANT MAKES AN EARLY PART 36 OFFER: WEBINAR 29th APRIL 2026
  • COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 4: WHY IS PD57AC BREACHED SO OFTEN? “SOLICITORS MIGHT FEEL UNDER PRESSURE TO SIGN CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE … EVEN WHEN THEY KNOW THAT STATEMENTS WERE NOT COMPLIANT…”
  • COST BITES 379: HIGH COURT JUDGE UPHOLDS DECISION THAT INTERIM BILLS WERE STATUTE BILLS AND THAT THE CLAIMANT COULD NOT SEEK ASSESSMENT OUT OF TIME
  • OPENING LINES TO START THE WEEK: “FOR CENTURIES, IT HAS BEEN RECOGNISED THAT HUMAN HEARING CAN BE DAMAGED BY EXPOSURE TO LOUD NOISE”

Top Posts

  • SERVICE POINTS 37 : IS SERVICE ON A P.0. BOX GOOD SERVICE? (OH - AND BY THE WAY - AS IT TURNS OUT - THE CLAIM FORM WAS NEVER, IN FACT, SERVED AT ALL): A BIT OF A SURPRISE FOR THE CLAIMANT AT THE APPEAL STAGE
  • OPENING LINES TO START THE WEEK: "FOR CENTURIES, IT HAS BEEN RECOGNISED THAT HUMAN HEARING CAN BE DAMAGED BY EXPOSURE TO LOUD NOISE"
  • BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: WHEN YOU ARE SEEKING PERMISSION TO RELY ON EXPERT EVIDENCE THE COURT HAS TO KNOW HOW MUCH IT WILL ALL COST...
  • COST BITES 379: HIGH COURT JUDGE UPHOLDS DECISION THAT INTERIM BILLS WERE STATUTE BILLS AND THAT THE CLAIMANT COULD NOT SEEK ASSESSMENT OUT OF TIME
  • WHAT TO DO IF THE DEFENDANT MAKES AN EARLY PART 36 OFFER: WEBINAR 29th APRIL 2026

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.