Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Witness statement » Page 8

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH: COMMENTS IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: THE SIGNATORY CANNOT HIDE BEHIND THE DRAFTSMAN

July 17, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The signing of a statement of truth is now an everyday event in litigation. With documents signed by clients, or by lawyers on behalf of their clients. Recent cases highlight the significance of the statement of truth. It is important…

HIGHWAYMEN, EVIDENCE AND DAMAGES ALL ON THE MENU.

July 14, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Damages, Members Content

There are some interesting observations in the judgment of Mr Recorder Acton David QC in Luffeorm Limited -v- Kitsons LLP [2015] EWHC B10(QB).  This illustrates some important issues in relation to evidence and the need to prove damages. “The Highwayman’s…

JUDGES AND WITNESSES 2: POISE AND POLISH IS FAR FROM CONCLUSIVE

July 8, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

This is the second post today on the issue of how judges assess witnesses. In Mudroglu -v- Reddish LLP [2015] EWHC 1044 (Ch) His Honour Judge Keyser QC had to consider issues relating to the credibility of two witnesses. THE…

EVIDENCE, COSTS AND THE CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES: A CANADIAN VIEW

June 24, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Costs, Members Content, Witness statements

This blog has discussed  issues relating to the judicial approach of  the credibility  of witnesses many times.  Some judges have, shall we say, not been backward in giving their views on the “value” of the evidence of some of the…

ASSESSING THE CREDIBILITY OF A WITNESS: IT IS A MATTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

June 3, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of HH Judge Brown QC in Mainline Digital Communications Ltd -v- Chaddah [2015] EWHC 1580 (QB) is an important illustration of the manner in which a judge assesses the credibility of a witness. “In my judgment, contemporaneous written…

APPEALING ON THE JUDGE'S FINDINGS OF FACTS: A TRIAL IS NOT A DRESS REHEARSAL BUT "THE FIRST AND LAST NIGHT OF THE SHOW"

May 12, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content

In the decision in Watson Farley and Williams -v- Ostrovizky today [2015] EWCA Civ 457 the Court of Appeal emphasised the difficulties of a party appealing findings of facts by the trial judge. “The aptness of the metaphor relating to…

AMENDING PLEADINGS LATE 1: WANI LLP -v- RBS: A MATTER OF INTEREST?

May 3, 2015 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

There have been a few cases recently relating to fairly last minute attempts to amend pleadings. The principles governing applications were considered by Mr Justice Henderson in Wani LLP -v- The Royal Bank of Scotland [2015] EWHC 1181 (Ch). It…

JUDGES MUST "CONTEND WITH THE CHANGING FASHIONS OF APPELLATE COURTS": ANOTHER LATE WITNESS STATEMENT; ANOTHER CASE WHERE RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED

April 29, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Bundles, Civil evidence, Members Content, Statements of Case, Witness statements

“This is yet another appeal concerning the proper application of CPR 3.9 as to relief from sanctions.” The opening words of the judgment of Mr Justice Cranston in Fouda -v- The Mayor & Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark…

WHY YOUR WITNESS STATEMENTS SHOULD BE MADE IN CHELSEA: MAKING FIRST HAND STATEMENTS AVOIDS PENALTIES

March 28, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content

The post earlier this week in relation to the need for full disclosure on without notice injunctions also highlighted the need for first hand evidence. There are real dangers when a solicitor signs a witness statement. That principle was highlighted…

A WITNESS STATEMENT FROM SOMEONE WITHOUT CAPACITY CAN STILL BE ADMITTED AS EVIDENCE : WITNESS EVIDENCE CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

March 12, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The case of Milroy -v- British Telecommunications PLC [2015] EWHC 532 (QB) is an important decision in terms of the analysis of the employer’s duty to provide training. However it also contains some interesting observations from Mr Justice William Davis…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS: ANOTHER EXAMPLE

March 10, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In Sloutsker -v- Romanova [2015] EWHC 545 (QB) Warby J granted the claimant relief from sanctions after it failed to serve witness statements in time. THE CASE The claimants brought an action for libel. The defendant applied for orders setting…

Y0UR OPPONENT'S WITNESS STATEMENT CANNOT BE DISCLOSED UNTIL AFTER IT IS USED AT A HEARING IN PUBLIC: A USEFUL REMINDER

February 26, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of Mr Justice Warby in Barry -v- Butler [2015] EWHC 447 (QB) contains some important reminders about witness statements. The witness statements received from an opposing party cannot be disclosed generally until they are used at a hearing…

PROVING MATTERS BY EVIDENCE: A LESSON FROM THE FAMILY COURT

February 17, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

It is certain that most lawyers involved in childcare matters will read the decision of Sir James Munby in Darlington Borough Council -v- M [2015] EWFC 11.  However there are points made in that judgment of general relevance to all…

WHO SAYS THAT YOU'LL WIN NOTHING WITH KIDS? THE WITNESS EVIDENCE IN WOODLAND -v- MAXWELL CONSIDERED

February 13, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The case of Woodland -v- Maxwell [2015] EWHC 273 (QB) is almost a procedural epic. It has involved one trip to the Court of Appeal to allow a withdrawal of admissions and a further trip to the Supreme Court on…

IN A DOG EAT DOG WORLD MAKE SURE YOU GET YOUR WITNESS STATEMENTS RIGHT (OR DON'T LET YOUR WITNESSES RABBIT ON WITHOUT GOOD EVIDENCE)

IN A DOG EAT DOG WORLD MAKE SURE YOU GET YOUR WITNESS STATEMENTS RIGHT (OR DON'T LET YOUR WITNESSES RABBIT ON WITHOUT GOOD EVIDENCE)

February 13, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in Supreme Petfoods Limited -v- Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Limited [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) contains a detailed analysis of the law relating to trade marks. Thanks to technology the judgment contains some vivid…

WITNESS STATEMENTS AND "LITIGATION WISHFUL THINKING"

February 9, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

It is surprising how many cases turn, in essence, on the judge’s assessment of the credibility of the witnesses.  In assessing the evidence on your own, and the other wise, litigators must be aware of the concept, and dangers, of…

WITNESS CREDIBILITY: WHAT FACTORS DOES THE COURT LOOK AT? ANOTHER EXAMPLE FROM THE MERCANTILE COURT

February 1, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The case of Excelerate Technology Ltd -v- Cumberbatch [2015] EWHC B1 Mercantile was looked at in an earlier post in relation to the judge’s observations about the costs budget*. It did, however, contain important observations about the way in which judges assess…

THE COURT OF APPEAL CAN RE-OPEN A DECISION TO REFUSE PERMISSION TO APPEAL WHEN IT IS ALLEGED THE JUDGMENT WAS OBTAINED BY FRAUD

February 1, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

In Bishop -v- Chhokar [2015] EWCA Civ 24 the Court of Appeal decided that it had jurisdiction to re-open an order refusing permission to appeal when it was alleged that a judgment was obtained by fraud. THE CASE The respondent…

LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS IN THE HIGH COURT

January 30, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In Devon & Cornwall Autistic Community Trust -v- Cornwall Council [2015] EWHC 129 (QB) the claimant’s application for the adjournment of the trial date was refused. However the claimant was given permission to serve witness statements late.  Mr Justice Green…

MORE ON ADVERSE INFERENCES FROM ABSENT WITNESSES: A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE

January 29, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In Webb -v- Liverpool Women’s NHS Foundation Trust [2015] EWHC 133 (QB) HH Judge Saffman (sitting as a judge of the High Court) considered the implications of an important witness not called by the defendant in a clinical negligence case….

GET YOUR WITNESS TO CHECK THEIR STATEMENT CAREFULLY: OR ELSE

January 29, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

Many earlier posts have concentrated upon the need for care and accuracy in the drafting of witness statements. A classic example of the problems that can occur is shown in the judgment of Mr Justice Warby in David Halberstam -v-…

ABSENT WITNESSES ARE NOT NECESSARILY DECISIVE: WESTERN TRADING CONSIDERED

January 26, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

Several recent posts have looked at the inferences the court can draw in circumstances where a witness is not called or is silent on key points.  This issue was mentioned  in a judgment today by H H Judge Mackie QC…

INFERENCES TO BE DRAWN FROM SILENCE: THE VIEWS OF THE SUPREME COURT

January 25, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In the recent case of  Gordon Ramsay -v- Gary Love [2015] EWHC 65 Mr Justice Morgan considered, among other things, the inferences that could properly be drawn from the absence or silence of a witness. He refers to the relevant…

THE DANGERS OF A PART 36 OFFER: CLAIMANT PAYS THREE TIMES MORE IN COSTS THAN HE RECEIVED IN DAMAGES

January 24, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Part 36

The dangers of a claimant rejecting a Part 36 offer are clearly demonstrated in the case of UWUG Ltd & Haiss -v- Ball [2015] EWHC 74 (IPEC). The claimant received damages of £2,859.20 but was ordered to pay the defendant…

THE RIHANNA CASE AND OPINION EVIDENCE IN WITNESS STATEMENTS: BEEN THERE, DONE THAT GOT THE TEE SHIRT

January 22, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

We should, perhaps, get used to celebrities dominating the law reports. After court fees are increased they will be the only people who will be able to afford litigation in any event.  The case of Robyn Rihanna Fenty -v- Arcadia…

DOCUMENTS, CIVIL EVIDENCE AND WITNESS STATEMENTS: SERVE PROPER NOTICES OR YOU COULD BE ON YOUR BIKE

January 21, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of His Honour Allan Gore QC (sitting as a High Court judge) in Edwards -v- London Borough of Sutton [2014] EWHC 4378 QB contains some important observations about documents, Civil Evidence Act notices and witness statements. THE CASE…

GET BUNDLES AND SKELETON ARGUMENTS TO COURT – OR ELSE: CHIEF CONSTABLE COPS IT

January 21, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Serving documents, Written advocacy

There is a brief report on Lawtel today of the case of Marsh -v- Ministry of Justice (QB Phillips J 20/01/2015)*. It provides an object lesson on the need for all parties (and non-parties) to lodge – or re-lodge -…

GORDON RAMSAY CASE AND WITNESS EVIDENCE: ABSENCE OF KEY WITNESSES DOES NOT LEAD TO TURNING UP OF THE HEAT

January 21, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The case of Gordon Ramsay -v- Gary Love [2015] EWHC 65 (Ch) has had much attention in the media, primarily because of the identity of the claimant. However the judge made important observations as to the inferences that can be…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: E-MAILING A COPY IS NOT GOOD SERVICE (AND WON'T BE EXCUSED)

January 20, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Witness statements

Service of the claim form raises its head for the second time in two days. In Dunbar Assets Plc -v- BCP Premier Limited [2014] EWHC 10 (Ch) Mr John Baldwin QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge) overturned an order that…

WITNESS "PREPARATION" IN A CIVIL CONTEXT: HOW DO WE HELP THE UNDERDOG WHILST WORKING ON A SHOESTRING?

January 20, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Useful links, Witness statements

The controversy surrounding the new guidelines by the CPS for the preparation of witnesses in serious cases has led me to consider the rules and principles relating to witness preparation in the context of civil litigation. This is always a…

LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS: ORAL APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME GRANTED – BUT ON STRICT TERMS

January 17, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In Rai -v- Jaskaran Singh Bholowasia Pardes Weekly (UK) Ltd [2014] EWHC 4501 (QB) Mrs Justice Simler granted what was effectively an oral application for relief from sanctions. THE CASE The claimant brought an action for defamation. There was an…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND THE LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS (AGAIN)

January 14, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

The issue of serving witness statements late, with relief from sanctions being required, was considered by Mr Justice Warby in Hamdani -v- Khafaf & others [2015] EWHC 38 (QB). It contains some timely warnings. THE CASE The claimants were bringing…

ENTERPRISE, PROPORTIONALITY, WITNESS STATEMENTS AND UNNECESSARY COSTS: OBSERVATIONS FROM THE HIGH COURT

January 13, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Costs, Members Content, Witness statements

In Enterprise Holdings, Inc -v- Europcar Group UK Ltd [2015] EWHC 17 (Ch) Mr Justice Arnold made some telling remarks which bear on proportionality, witness evidence and costs. THE CASE The dispute related to the use of a “e” logo…

BEWARE THE EXPERT WHO "LECTURES" THE COURT (AND TELLS THE JUDGE WHO TO BELIEVE)

January 6, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In Walls -v- London Eastern Railway Ltd (N Wilkinson QC) 05/12/2014* the judge found that the claimant’s continuing back pain was caused by a long-standing degenerative spinal condition rather than an accident. THE JUDGE’S COMMENTARY ON THE EXPERT EVIDENCE One…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: BUNDLES; EXPERT EVIDENCE AND LITIGANTS IN PERSON

January 5, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The case of Nata Lee Ltd -v- Abid [2014] EWCA Civ 1652 has already attracted attention following the observations the Court of Appeal make about relief from sanctions and litigants in person. However there are several important observations about procedure…

DRAFTING WITNESS STATEMENTS: GUIDANCE FROM THE BAR COUNCIL THAT EVERY LITIGATOR SHOULD READ

January 1, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

 The Bar Council has very useful guidance drafting witness statements in civil proceedings*. This deals with  the practicalities of drafting statements and ethical issues that arise in the material that can properly be included (and omitted) from statement. It is, as…

CIVIL CASE OF THE YEAR: AA -v- LBS: DAVID -v- GOLIATH?

December 29, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Witness statements

There were only a few comments when I asked, on twitter, for recommendations for the civil case of the year.  I have overlooked the obvious candidate (Denton)and gone for a case that can, and should, reinvigorate belief in the civil…

WITNESS STATEMENTS GIVING THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF: A RULE OVERLOOKED AT YOUR PERIL

December 21, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In JSC Mezhdunarodniy Promyshlenniy Bank -v- Sergi Viktorovich Pugachev [2014] EWHC 4336 (Ch) Mr Justice Mann made some important observations in relation to the need for a witness statement to identify the sources upon which it is based. THE CASE…

"THE LEAST MANAGEABLE CASE I HAVE EVER TRIED TO MANAGE": CASE MANAGEMENT UPHELD BY THE COURT OF APPEAL

December 16, 2014 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

This was the description given by His Honour Judge Mackie QC when he was considering, and refusing, an application by the defendant to strike the action out. The decisions he made were upheld by the Court of Appeal In Walsham…

EVIDENCE AND CAUSATION: COMMON SENSE CAN BE APPLIED

December 14, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Members Content, Witness statements

In Soboleska -v- Threlfall [2014] EWHC 4219 (QB) Mr Justice Foskett made some important observations about the use of commonsense in assessing the likely cause of serious injuries suffered in a road traffic accident. THE FACTS The claimant suffered physical…

ASSESSING WITNESSES: A UNIVERSAL ISSUE IN LITIGATION

December 8, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The judge’s assessment of witnesses is often the crucial element in most cases that go to trial. This applies at every level, from the small claims arbitration to the most complex commercial dispute (and, of course, high profile defamation actions)….

THE MITCHELL JUDGMENT AGAIN: PREVIOUS INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS

November 30, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The issue of witness credibility in the Mitchell case has already been considered on this blog.   However reading the transcript gives rise to more issues.  Here we look at one – the significance of the previous statements made by…

GETTING EVIDENCE TO TRIAL TO PROVE YOUR CASE: BE CAREFUL OF "MISSING" WITNESSES?

November 28, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Members Content, Witness statements

This has been, it has to be said, an interesting week for considering evidence in civil cases. Another interesting example can be found in the decision in Howmet Ltd -v- Economy Services Limited [2014] EWHC 3933 (TCC), a decision by…

WITNESS STATEMENTS AND WITNESS CREDIBILITY: GETTING BACK TO BASICS

November 27, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

If a litigant takes a matter to trial and the result rests, ultimately, on witness evidence, then those advising must (or at least should) have a clear and certain grasp of the factors governing witness credibility. This issue is almost…

THE MITCHELL CASE AND WITNESS EVIDENCE: CREDIBILITY, STRONG VIEWS AND RELIABILITY

November 27, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The Mitchell case was at the forefront of attention a year ago when the Court of Appeal set out its (apparently widely misunderstood) views on relief from sanctions. It is even more in the headlines today. The case has been…

ONE YEAR LATE IN SERVING A WITNESS STATEMENT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS GRANTED – BUT ON TERMS

November 24, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

There is a report on Lawtel *of the case of Owners of Motor Vessel Coal Hunter -v- Owners of Motor Vessel Yusho Regulus (QBD Admiralty 20/11/2014, Teare J) where the court considered an application for permission to rely on a…

LITIGATION IN THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ENTERPRISE COURT: A TALE OF TWO DRESSES

November 24, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The transcripts of cases in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Courts are often challenging reading.  They regularly contain technical material which is difficult for the non-specialist to follow.  However the case of John Kaldor Fabricmaker UK Ltd -v- Lee Ann Fashions…

WITNESS STATEMENTS THAT HARM RATHER THAN HELP AND A FAILURE TO PROVE DAMAGES: A HIGH COURT CASE EXAMINED

November 22, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Expert evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In Re-Use Collections Limited -v- Sendall &  May Glass Recycling Ltd [2014] EWHC 3852 (QB) H.H. Judge Davies made some important observations about drafting witness statements. It is positively unwise to “cross-reference” witness statements to the evidence of other witnesses…

WITNESS CREDIBILITY, BOLAM AND CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE: A HIGH COURT DECISION

November 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Expert evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of Stephens J in McGovern  -v- Sharkey [2014] NIQB 117 contains some important observations in relation to the Bolam test and the role of evidence and experts in this context. It demonstrates that the credibility of a lay…

WHEN DOES MENTIONING LEGAL ADVICE IN A WITNESS STATEMENT LEAD TO WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE

November 13, 2014 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Witness statements

In The National Crime Agency -v- Perry [2014] EWHC 3759 Mr Justice Wilkie considered the issue of when mention of legal advice in a witness statement leads to waiver of privilege so the legal advice should be disclosed. THE ISSUES…

← Previous 1 … 7 8 9 10 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.4K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 3: WHY PD57AC WAS INTRODUCED: “THE PROPER AND SENSIBLE SCOPE OF EVIDENCE-IN-CHIEF IS NO LONGER THE STOCK-IN-TRADE KNOWLEDGE OF THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROOFING WITNESSSES…”
  • PROVING THINGS 288: HOW SHOULD A COURT CONSIDER A CLAIM FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS WHEN THE CLAIMANT IS STILL IN EMPLOYMENT? SMITH -v- MANCHESTER APPROACH PREVAILS
  • CLAIMS FOR LOSS OF EARNINGS: AVOIDING THE PITFALLS: WEBINAR 19th JUNE 2026 (TOGETHER WITH A USEFUL QUESTIONNAIRE AND SERIES OF CHECKLISTS)
  • THE “WEAPONISATION” OF APPLICATIONS TO COMMIT IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: IT’S NOT CLEVER, IT’S NOT “TOUGH” AND IT CERTAINLY IS NOT A MARKETING TOOL
  • COST BITES 378 : REFORM OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974, PART III: READ THE CONSULATION PAPER: A CHANCE TO COMMENT ON THE PROVISIONS THAT ARE “A GREAT MYSTERY” TO MANY SOLICITORS (NOT MY WORDS…)

Top Posts

  • COST (MEGA) BITES 378: WHO WOULD SPEND £15,751,483 PLUS VAT TO RECOVER DAMAGES OF £16.91? (WELCOME TO THE SURREAL WORLD OF "COLLECTIVE PROCEEDINGS": THE CAT ARE CONCERNED THAT LITIGATION IS BEING BROUGHT FOR THE LAWYERS & FUNDERS RATHER THAN CONSUMERS
  • THE "WEAPONISATION" OF APPLICATIONS TO COMMIT IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: IT'S NOT CLEVER, IT'S NOT "TOUGH" AND IT CERTAINLY IS NOT A MARKETING TOOL
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: SCHEDULES AND COUNTER-SCHEDULES ARE NOT A "NUMBER CRUNCHING EXERCISE" (APRIL 2018)
  • WITNESS STATEMENTS SERVED LATE: THE COURT GRANTED RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS - BUT... : BE WARY OF MISSING THINGS WHEN OTHER THINGS ARE GOING ON...
  • COMMERCIAL LITIGATORS ON THE NAUGHTY STEP 2: NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PD57AC: "HE KNOWS NOT OF WHAT HE SPEAKS"

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.