Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Witness statement » Page 8

USING WITNESS STATEMENTS PREPARED IN ANOTHER ACTION: WHEN IS A "HEARING HELD IN PUBLIC"

January 2, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

CPR 32.12 prevents witness statements served in an action being used for any other purpose.  However there is an exception when a statement is “put in evidence at a hearing held in public”.  This issue was considered in Kimathi -v- Foreign…

CORROBORATIVE WITNESSES : "SIMILAR FACT EVIDENCE" ALLOWED IN TEST CASE

December 21, 2015 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil evidence, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

We have already looked at the decision in Kimathi -v- Foreign & Commonwealth Office [2015]EWHC 3432 (QB) in relation to the issue of historians being called as witnesses.  Here we look at the judgment in relation to corroborative/”similar fact” evidence. KEY…

WITNESS EVIDENCE AND CONTEMPORARY DOCUMENTS: THE RECORDS MAY NOT BE RIGHT

December 17, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Clinical Negligence, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

This blog has looked, many times, at the issue of witness credibility and the various criteria that judges use when assessing evidence. This issue was to the fore in the Court of Appeal judgment yesterday in Synclair -v- East Lancashire…

LATE AMENDMENT TO PLEADINGS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ALLOWED: CLAIMANT COMES TO GRIEF ON APPEAL

December 16, 2015 · by gexall · in Amendment, Members Content, Statements of Case, Uncategorized, Witness statements

In Ali -v- Siddique [2015] EWCA Civ 1258 the Court of Appeal overturned a decision granting permission to amend the Particulars of Claim. Consequently the defendant’s appeal was allowed and the claimant’s action failed. KEY POINTS There is a heavy…

"TOTALLY HOPELESS" APPLICATION FOR DISCLOSURE;INADEQUATE WITNESS STATEMENTS;APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION REFUSED:ALL LEGAL LIFE IS HERE

December 11, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Serving documents, Uncategorized, Witness statements

The judgment of Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart in London Borough of Bromley -v- Heckel [2015] EWHC encompasses many of the themes regularly discussed in this blog. Proceedings were issued late;there was an inappropriate application for disclosure;the witness evidence was inadequate. Finally…

WHEN THE CREDIBILITY OF THE LAY AND EXPERT WITNESSES LIES IN SHREDS

November 30, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

The previous post in relation to Part 36 led me to examine the substantive judgment of Mr Justice Coulson in Van Oord UK Limited -v- Allseas UK Limited [2015] EWHC 3074 (TCC). It contains as damning an assessment of witness…

THE YEO CASE: WITNESS EVIDENCE & CREDIBILITY: THERE'S A HOOK HERE SOMEWHERE

November 25, 2015 · by gexall · in Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

The decision of Mr Justice Warby in Yeo -v- Times Newspapers Limited [2015] EWHC 3375 (QB) is one of those cases that, obviously, will be of wider interest.  It contains much of interest in relation to an analysis of the…

GOOD BUNDLES, GOOD ADVOCACY, POOR WITNESS STATEMENTS

November 18, 2015 · by gexall · in Bundles, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

The final paragraph of the judgment of HH Judge Behrens in Royal National Institute for Deaf People -v- Turner [2015] EWHC 3301 Ch speaks volumes.  I will allow it to speak for itself.   “I cannot leave this case without…

PROVING THINGS BY EVIDENCE: ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF AN ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE LEADING TO A CASE FAILING

November 11, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

The case of Goldsmith Williams -v- E.Surv Limited [2015] EWCA Civ 1147 will, no doubt, be discussed as a professional negligence case and it may have some impact on the duties of conveyancing solicitors. However the appeal, at heart, relates…

WITNESS STATEMENT TOO SHORT; SKELETON ARGUMENT TOO LONG AND THE JUDGE WAS NOT NOT PERVERSE

October 25, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements, Written advocacy

In Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust -v- Evans [2015] EWCA Civ 1059 the Court of Appeal rejected an appeal by the defendant against a finding of liability.   There are important observations in relation to procedure which merit examination.  In…

THE CIVIL EVIDENCE ACT, THE ABSENT WITNESS AND WITNESS CREDIBILITY: A CASE IN POINT

October 4, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

This blog has already looked at the decision in Mohidin -v- Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2015] EWHC 2740 (QB) in the context of the contents of witness statements and the length of the trial bundles. That judgment also…

WHOSE WITNESS STATEMENT IS IT ANYWAY? WELL THE SOLICITOR DRAFTED IT FOR ME

September 21, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

The judgment of Mr Justice Blair in Barrett -v- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 2627 (QB) deals with many complex issues of causation and law in a difficult clinical negligence case. However I want to deal…

PLEADINGS PROOF AND EVIDENCE: CONFUSION IN ONE OFTEN LEADS TO PROBLEMS WITH THE OTHER

September 18, 2015 · by gexall · in Members Content, Statements of Case, Uncategorized

In Mann -v- Shelfside Holdings Limited [2015] EWHC 2583 (QB) the pleadings required rectifying at the start of the trial. The case is an interesting example of problems with pleading and proof. “This is not just a minor pleading point…

BOOK REVIEW: OCCUPIERS, HIGHWAYS AND DEFECTIVE PREMISES CLAIMS: WILL IT STOP YOUR CLAIMS SLIPPING UP?

BOOK REVIEW: OCCUPIERS, HIGHWAYS AND DEFECTIVE PREMISES CLAIMS: WILL IT STOP YOUR CLAIMS SLIPPING UP?

September 5, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Uncategorized

Law books nowadays are not reviewed enough. Particularly practitioner’s texts.  Given that there are precious few legal bookshops in which people can browse it is nice to see s a review now and again. I have been sent a copy…

DELAY AND STRIKING OUT FOR ABUSE OF PROCESS: SOME INTERESTING LESSONS

September 1, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content, Uncategorized

The judgment of Master Bowles in Solland International Ltd -v- Clifford Harris & Co [2015] EWHC 2018 (Ch) contains several matters of interest to litigators. Not only the fact that the action was struck out but some of the allegations…

WITNESS STATEMENTS AND EVIDENCE: AFTER 278 YEARS OF JUDICIAL PROMPTING HAVE PRACTITIONERS GOT THE MESSAGE?

August 14, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

Often (once a month or so but sometimes more frequently) this blog considers a case where the judge has been critical of the witness evidence in written form. Often because the evidence is irrelevant, argumentative and consists of submissions.  This…

WITNESS CREDIBILITY AGAIN: THE HIDDEN VICTIMS OF PERSONAL INJURY FRAUD: HONEST CLAIMANTS

August 2, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

This post should serve as a necessary balance/counterblast to the earlier post on the Sonae Industria case.  In that case some of the witnesses were found to be  honest and some patently dishonest.  It was a feature  of that case…

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH: COMMENTS IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: THE SIGNATORY CANNOT HIDE BEHIND THE DRAFTSMAN

July 17, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The signing of a statement of truth is now an everyday event in litigation. With documents signed by clients, or by lawyers on behalf of their clients. Recent cases highlight the significance of the statement of truth. It is important…

HIGHWAYMEN, EVIDENCE AND DAMAGES ALL ON THE MENU.

July 14, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Damages, Members Content

There are some interesting observations in the judgment of Mr Recorder Acton David QC in Luffeorm Limited -v- Kitsons LLP [2015] EWHC B10(QB).  This illustrates some important issues in relation to evidence and the need to prove damages. “The Highwayman’s…

JUDGES AND WITNESSES 2: POISE AND POLISH IS FAR FROM CONCLUSIVE

July 8, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

This is the second post today on the issue of how judges assess witnesses. In Mudroglu -v- Reddish LLP [2015] EWHC 1044 (Ch) His Honour Judge Keyser QC had to consider issues relating to the credibility of two witnesses. THE…

EVIDENCE, COSTS AND THE CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES: A CANADIAN VIEW

June 24, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Costs, Members Content, Witness statements

This blog has discussed  issues relating to the judicial approach of  the credibility  of witnesses many times.  Some judges have, shall we say, not been backward in giving their views on the “value” of the evidence of some of the…

ASSESSING THE CREDIBILITY OF A WITNESS: IT IS A MATTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

June 3, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of HH Judge Brown QC in Mainline Digital Communications Ltd -v- Chaddah [2015] EWHC 1580 (QB) is an important illustration of the manner in which a judge assesses the credibility of a witness. “In my judgment, contemporaneous written…

APPEALING ON THE JUDGE'S FINDINGS OF FACTS: A TRIAL IS NOT A DRESS REHEARSAL BUT "THE FIRST AND LAST NIGHT OF THE SHOW"

May 12, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Members Content

In the decision in Watson Farley and Williams -v- Ostrovizky today [2015] EWCA Civ 457 the Court of Appeal emphasised the difficulties of a party appealing findings of facts by the trial judge. “The aptness of the metaphor relating to…

AMENDING PLEADINGS LATE 1: WANI LLP -v- RBS: A MATTER OF INTEREST?

May 3, 2015 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

There have been a few cases recently relating to fairly last minute attempts to amend pleadings. The principles governing applications were considered by Mr Justice Henderson in Wani LLP -v- The Royal Bank of Scotland [2015] EWHC 1181 (Ch). It…

JUDGES MUST "CONTEND WITH THE CHANGING FASHIONS OF APPELLATE COURTS": ANOTHER LATE WITNESS STATEMENT; ANOTHER CASE WHERE RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED

April 29, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Bundles, Civil evidence, Members Content, Statements of Case, Witness statements

“This is yet another appeal concerning the proper application of CPR 3.9 as to relief from sanctions.” The opening words of the judgment of Mr Justice Cranston in Fouda -v- The Mayor & Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark…

WHY YOUR WITNESS STATEMENTS SHOULD BE MADE IN CHELSEA: MAKING FIRST HAND STATEMENTS AVOIDS PENALTIES

March 28, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content

The post earlier this week in relation to the need for full disclosure on without notice injunctions also highlighted the need for first hand evidence. There are real dangers when a solicitor signs a witness statement. That principle was highlighted…

A WITNESS STATEMENT FROM SOMEONE WITHOUT CAPACITY CAN STILL BE ADMITTED AS EVIDENCE : WITNESS EVIDENCE CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

March 12, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The case of Milroy -v- British Telecommunications PLC [2015] EWHC 532 (QB) is an important decision in terms of the analysis of the employer’s duty to provide training. However it also contains some interesting observations from Mr Justice William Davis…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS: ANOTHER EXAMPLE

March 10, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In Sloutsker -v- Romanova [2015] EWHC 545 (QB) Warby J granted the claimant relief from sanctions after it failed to serve witness statements in time. THE CASE The claimants brought an action for libel. The defendant applied for orders setting…

Y0UR OPPONENT'S WITNESS STATEMENT CANNOT BE DISCLOSED UNTIL AFTER IT IS USED AT A HEARING IN PUBLIC: A USEFUL REMINDER

February 26, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Disclosure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of Mr Justice Warby in Barry -v- Butler [2015] EWHC 447 (QB) contains some important reminders about witness statements. The witness statements received from an opposing party cannot be disclosed generally until they are used at a hearing…

PROVING MATTERS BY EVIDENCE: A LESSON FROM THE FAMILY COURT

February 17, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements, Written advocacy

It is certain that most lawyers involved in childcare matters will read the decision of Sir James Munby in Darlington Borough Council -v- M [2015] EWFC 11.  However there are points made in that judgment of general relevance to all…

WHO SAYS THAT YOU'LL WIN NOTHING WITH KIDS? THE WITNESS EVIDENCE IN WOODLAND -v- MAXWELL CONSIDERED

February 13, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The case of Woodland -v- Maxwell [2015] EWHC 273 (QB) is almost a procedural epic. It has involved one trip to the Court of Appeal to allow a withdrawal of admissions and a further trip to the Supreme Court on…

IN A DOG EAT DOG WORLD MAKE SURE YOU GET YOUR WITNESS STATEMENTS RIGHT (OR DON'T LET YOUR WITNESSES RABBIT ON WITHOUT GOOD EVIDENCE)

IN A DOG EAT DOG WORLD MAKE SURE YOU GET YOUR WITNESS STATEMENTS RIGHT (OR DON'T LET YOUR WITNESSES RABBIT ON WITHOUT GOOD EVIDENCE)

February 13, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in Supreme Petfoods Limited -v- Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Limited [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) contains a detailed analysis of the law relating to trade marks. Thanks to technology the judgment contains some vivid…

WITNESS STATEMENTS AND "LITIGATION WISHFUL THINKING"

February 9, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

It is surprising how many cases turn, in essence, on the judge’s assessment of the credibility of the witnesses.  In assessing the evidence on your own, and the other wise, litigators must be aware of the concept, and dangers, of…

WITNESS CREDIBILITY: WHAT FACTORS DOES THE COURT LOOK AT? ANOTHER EXAMPLE FROM THE MERCANTILE COURT

February 1, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The case of Excelerate Technology Ltd -v- Cumberbatch [2015] EWHC B1 Mercantile was looked at in an earlier post in relation to the judge’s observations about the costs budget*. It did, however, contain important observations about the way in which judges assess…

THE COURT OF APPEAL CAN RE-OPEN A DECISION TO REFUSE PERMISSION TO APPEAL WHEN IT IS ALLEGED THE JUDGMENT WAS OBTAINED BY FRAUD

February 1, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content, Uncategorized, Witness statements

In Bishop -v- Chhokar [2015] EWCA Civ 24 the Court of Appeal decided that it had jurisdiction to re-open an order refusing permission to appeal when it was alleged that a judgment was obtained by fraud. THE CASE The respondent…

LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS IN THE HIGH COURT

January 30, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

In Devon & Cornwall Autistic Community Trust -v- Cornwall Council [2015] EWHC 129 (QB) the claimant’s application for the adjournment of the trial date was refused. However the claimant was given permission to serve witness statements late.  Mr Justice Green…

MORE ON ADVERSE INFERENCES FROM ABSENT WITNESSES: A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE

January 29, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In Webb -v- Liverpool Women’s NHS Foundation Trust [2015] EWHC 133 (QB) HH Judge Saffman (sitting as a judge of the High Court) considered the implications of an important witness not called by the defendant in a clinical negligence case….

GET YOUR WITNESS TO CHECK THEIR STATEMENT CAREFULLY: OR ELSE

January 29, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

Many earlier posts have concentrated upon the need for care and accuracy in the drafting of witness statements. A classic example of the problems that can occur is shown in the judgment of Mr Justice Warby in David Halberstam -v-…

ABSENT WITNESSES ARE NOT NECESSARILY DECISIVE: WESTERN TRADING CONSIDERED

January 26, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

Several recent posts have looked at the inferences the court can draw in circumstances where a witness is not called or is silent on key points.  This issue was mentioned  in a judgment today by H H Judge Mackie QC…

INFERENCES TO BE DRAWN FROM SILENCE: THE VIEWS OF THE SUPREME COURT

January 25, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In the recent case of  Gordon Ramsay -v- Gary Love [2015] EWHC 65 Mr Justice Morgan considered, among other things, the inferences that could properly be drawn from the absence or silence of a witness. He refers to the relevant…

THE DANGERS OF A PART 36 OFFER: CLAIMANT PAYS THREE TIMES MORE IN COSTS THAN HE RECEIVED IN DAMAGES

January 24, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Costs budgeting, Members Content, Part 36

The dangers of a claimant rejecting a Part 36 offer are clearly demonstrated in the case of UWUG Ltd & Haiss -v- Ball [2015] EWHC 74 (IPEC). The claimant received damages of £2,859.20 but was ordered to pay the defendant…

THE RIHANNA CASE AND OPINION EVIDENCE IN WITNESS STATEMENTS: BEEN THERE, DONE THAT GOT THE TEE SHIRT

January 22, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

We should, perhaps, get used to celebrities dominating the law reports. After court fees are increased they will be the only people who will be able to afford litigation in any event.  The case of Robyn Rihanna Fenty -v- Arcadia…

DOCUMENTS, CIVIL EVIDENCE AND WITNESS STATEMENTS: SERVE PROPER NOTICES OR YOU COULD BE ON YOUR BIKE

January 21, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

The judgment of His Honour Allan Gore QC (sitting as a High Court judge) in Edwards -v- London Borough of Sutton [2014] EWHC 4378 QB contains some important observations about documents, Civil Evidence Act notices and witness statements. THE CASE…

GET BUNDLES AND SKELETON ARGUMENTS TO COURT – OR ELSE: CHIEF CONSTABLE COPS IT

January 21, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Serving documents, Written advocacy

There is a brief report on Lawtel today of the case of Marsh -v- Ministry of Justice (QB Phillips J 20/01/2015)*. It provides an object lesson on the need for all parties (and non-parties) to lodge – or re-lodge -…

GORDON RAMSAY CASE AND WITNESS EVIDENCE: ABSENCE OF KEY WITNESSES DOES NOT LEAD TO TURNING UP OF THE HEAT

January 21, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

The case of Gordon Ramsay -v- Gary Love [2015] EWHC 65 (Ch) has had much attention in the media, primarily because of the identity of the claimant. However the judge made important observations as to the inferences that can be…

SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: E-MAILING A COPY IS NOT GOOD SERVICE (AND WON'T BE EXCUSED)

January 20, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents, Witness statements

Service of the claim form raises its head for the second time in two days. In Dunbar Assets Plc -v- BCP Premier Limited [2014] EWHC 10 (Ch) Mr John Baldwin QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge) overturned an order that…

WITNESS "PREPARATION" IN A CIVIL CONTEXT: HOW DO WE HELP THE UNDERDOG WHILST WORKING ON A SHOESTRING?

January 20, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Useful links, Witness statements

The controversy surrounding the new guidelines by the CPS for the preparation of witnesses in serious cases has led me to consider the rules and principles relating to witness preparation in the context of civil litigation. This is always a…

LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS: ORAL APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME GRANTED – BUT ON STRICT TERMS

January 17, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

In Rai -v- Jaskaran Singh Bholowasia Pardes Weekly (UK) Ltd [2014] EWHC 4501 (QB) Mrs Justice Simler granted what was effectively an oral application for relief from sanctions. THE CASE The claimant brought an action for defamation. There was an…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS AND THE LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS (AGAIN)

January 14, 2015 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

The issue of serving witness statements late, with relief from sanctions being required, was considered by Mr Justice Warby in Hamdani -v- Khafaf & others [2015] EWHC 38 (QB). It contains some timely warnings. THE CASE The claimants were bringing…

ENTERPRISE, PROPORTIONALITY, WITNESS STATEMENTS AND UNNECESSARY COSTS: OBSERVATIONS FROM THE HIGH COURT

January 13, 2015 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Costs, Members Content, Witness statements

In Enterprise Holdings, Inc -v- Europcar Group UK Ltd [2015] EWHC 17 (Ch) Mr Justice Arnold made some telling remarks which bear on proportionality, witness evidence and costs. THE CASE The dispute related to the use of a “e” logo…

← Previous 1 … 7 8 9 … 11 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • SHOULD THE COURT ALLOW A “NEWLY APPOINTED” EMPLOYEE TO REPRESENT A LIMITED COMPANY AT A HEARING?
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: THIRTEEN YEARS OF BLOGGING (JUNE 2013): THE TEENAGE YEARS ARE STARTING…
  • ASKING THE JUDGE QUESTIONS AFTER JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED: THEY HAVE TO BE NECESSARY TO ENABLE THE PARTIES TO UNDERSTAND THE REASONING OF THE DECISION (AND THESE GO TOO FAR…)
  • THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 83: THE CASE OF THE SOLICITOR’S LIEN: THE JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE DECIDED AN APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT ON THE BASIS OF AN UNPLEADED CASE
  • THE NEW SRA GUIDANCE ON SUPERVISION 7: RECORDING ARRANGMENTS (IF IT ISN’T WRITTEN DOWN IT HASN’T HAPPENED…)

Top Posts

NEW COURT FEES COMING INTO FORCE ON THE 13th JULY 2026: SOME BRAND NEW PROVISIONS AND THE INFLATIONARY INCREASES: THE CIVIL AND FAMILY COURTS, THE MAGISTRATES' COURT, THE LANDS CHAMBER (AND MANY OTHERS)
A NEW SERIES OF USEFUL ONLINE CALCULATORS FOR LITIGATORS AND THE LEGAL PROFESSION (WITH A 20% DISCOUNT FOR CLB READERS): MAKING IT ALL ADD UP
BACK TO BASICS MONDAY: MAKING AN APPLICATION TO THE COURT: HOW TO AVOID PROBLEMS: KEY POINTS AND SOME USEFUL CHECKLISTS
COST BITES 404: JUDGE ORDERS DEFENDANT TO PAY COSTS ON THE INDEMNITY BASIS: PARTIES HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO ENGAGE WITH THE PROCESS OF LITIGATION: "THEY SHOULD BE USING NON-COURT BASED DISPUTE RESOLUTION WHEREVER POSSIBLE"
THE COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS A JUDICIAL REVIEW DECISION IN FAVOUR OF A SOLICITOR: THE OMBUDSMAN GOT NOTHING WRONG (QUITE A LOT HERE ABOUT VULNERABLE CLIENTS AS WELL...)

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.