Civil Litigation Brief
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers, Leeds, Manchester & Birmingham. 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, London.
Browse: Home » 2020 » September
PARTICIPATION IN COURTS AND TRIBUNALS:  NEW BOOK

PARTICIPATION IN COURTS AND TRIBUNALS: NEW BOOK

September 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Book Review, Members Content

The issue of participation in court proceedings is a very real one at the moment.  Almost on cue yesterday the publication today of Participation in Courts and Tribunals: Concepts, Realities and Aspirations (editors: Jessica Jacobson and Penny Cooper). It is available as…

"A MOST UNUSUAL CASE": "A JUDGE'S DRAFT JUDGMENT IS NOT AN INVITATION TO TREAT"

“A MOST UNUSUAL CASE”: “A JUDGE’S DRAFT JUDGMENT IS NOT AN INVITATION TO TREAT”

September 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Members Content

In FS v RS and JS [2020] EWFC 63 Sir James Munby warned against trying to re-open cases after judgment has been given.  There were several attempts to re-open the judgment after it was given. It is the only judgment…

CIVIL PROCEDURE: BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP - SEPTEMBER 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE: BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP – SEPTEMBER 2020

September 30, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Useful links

This round up also covers specific posts and articles in relation to coronavirus. There will no longer be a specific round up covering coronavirus and and civil procedure.  There is, however, a monthly round up of a wide range of…

FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY AND WASTED COSTS AGAINST A SOLICITOR: THE BURDEN IS ON THE APPLICANT TO PROVE CAUSATION

FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY AND WASTED COSTS AGAINST A SOLICITOR: THE BURDEN IS ON THE APPLICANT TO PROVE CAUSATION

September 29, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Costs, Members Content, Wasted Costs

The judgment of Mrs Justice Lambert in  Razaq v Iqbal & Ors [2019] EWHC 3924 (QB) provides an interesting example of a failure to prove causation in a wasted costs application. A solicitor had been negligent in failing to pass…

ONLINE COURTS DURING THE PANDEMIC:  RESEARCH AND QUESTIONS:  LESSONS FROM TEXAS

ONLINE COURTS DURING THE PANDEMIC: RESEARCH AND QUESTIONS: LESSONS FROM TEXAS

September 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Access to justice, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

The problems of keeping the courts going during a pandemic are universal and worldwide. Countries throughout the globe  are getting to grips with the problems caused by remote hearings.  Professor Elizabeth Thornburg  from the Southern Methodist University has written a…

VIDEO EVIDENCE NOT ALLOWED AT TRIAL: APPEAL AGAINST REFUSAL DISMISSED:  A "STORM IN A TEACUP"

VIDEO EVIDENCE NOT ALLOWED AT TRIAL: APPEAL AGAINST REFUSAL DISMISSED: A “STORM IN A TEACUP”

September 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil evidence, Clinical Negligence, Members Content, Personal Injury

In  Wilcox v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2020] EWHC 2555 (QB) Mrs Justice Lambert dismissed an appeal against a refusal by a defendant to allow video evidence to be adduced at trial.  The evidence was not relevant and…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 86: PRE-ACTION ADMISSIONS: THE DANGERS OF NOT MAKING THEM AND THE CONSEQUENCES IF YOU DO

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 86: PRE-ACTION ADMISSIONS: THE DANGERS OF NOT MAKING THEM AND THE CONSEQUENCES IF YOU DO

September 28, 2020 · by gexall · in Admissions, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The judgment in Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service v Veevers [2020] EWHC 2550 (Comm) HHJ Pearce emphasises the point that a party can make a formal pre-action admission.  A party who tries an alternative “non-formal” admission may well not get…

STRESS: HOMEWORKING, SOCIAL ISOLATION AND FISH FILES: A RECAP OF PREVIOUS POSTS THAT MAY BE ABLE TO HELP

STRESS: HOMEWORKING, SOCIAL ISOLATION AND FISH FILES: A RECAP OF PREVIOUS POSTS THAT MAY BE ABLE TO HELP

September 27, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Members Content, Well being

There has been some discussion on Twitter recently about stress at work and the problems caused when mistakes are made (particularly when they are your own fault).   Added to this we have the difficulties of home working, the lack of…

FATAL ACCIDENT: LEGAL COSTS OF ATTENDING INQUEST WERE RECOVERABLE: THE DANGERS TO DEFENDANTS OF MAKING AN EQUIVOCAL "ADMISSION"

FATAL ACCIDENT: LEGAL COSTS OF ATTENDING INQUEST WERE RECOVERABLE: THE DANGERS TO DEFENDANTS OF MAKING AN EQUIVOCAL “ADMISSION”

September 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Costs, Fatal Accidents, Members Content

In the judgment today in Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service v Veevers [2020] EWHC 2550 (Comm) HHJ Pearce upheld a decision that the legal costs incurred in attending an inquest were recoverable as costs in a subsequent action for…

CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF 25 YEARS AGO:  A QUARTER OF A CENTURY OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF 25 YEARS AGO: A QUARTER OF A CENTURY OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

September 25, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Striking out

Nobody knew what a “blog” was 25 years ago. However at that time Civil Litigation Brief  did exist, it was a monthly column in the Solicitors Journal.  It is interesting to see how much (or how little) matters have moved…

GOT TO DRAFT A DEFENCE? SOME HELPFUL GUIDANCE FROM OUR CANADIAN COUSINS

GOT TO DRAFT A DEFENCE? SOME HELPFUL GUIDANCE FROM OUR CANADIAN COUSINS

September 24, 2020 · by gexall · in Members Content, Statements of Case, Useful links

  There is relatively little guidance given on the process involved in drafting a defence.  There is some useful help given the the Law Society of Ontario Practice Area Resource “How to Prepare a Statement of Defence”. Some of this…

THE DIFFICULTY IN APPEALING A DENTON TYPE DECISION

THE DIFFICULTY IN APPEALING A DENTON TYPE DECISION

September 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

The second issue in  judgment of HHJ Matthews (sitting as a High Court judge) in Wolf Rock (Cornwall) Ltd v Langhelle [2020] EWHC 2500 (Ch) was whether the appellant was able to appeal the District Judge’s refusal to grant relief…

DENTON PRINCIPLES APPLY WHERE WITNESS EVIDENCE SERVED LATE

DENTON PRINCIPLES APPLY WHERE WITNESS EVIDENCE SERVED LATE

September 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Extensions of time, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

The judgment of HHJ Matthews (sitting as a High Court judge) in Wolf Rock (Cornwall) Ltd v Langhelle [2020] EWHC 2500 (Ch) considers the issue of whether the Denton principles apply when a witness statement is served late but there…

Resumption of Possession Cases on 20 September 2020:  Statement from the Master of the Rolls

Resumption of Possession Cases on 20 September 2020: Statement from the Master of the Rolls

September 23, 2020 · by gexall · in Coronavirus, Members Content

On the 17th September 2020 the Master of the Rolls issued a statement about the lifting of the stay on possession cases that took place on the 20th September.  That statement is reproduced below, together with the links referred to….

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS  85: DIRECTIONS AND COURT ORDERS SHOULD BE "REALISTIC AND ACHIEVABLE"

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 85: DIRECTIONS AND COURT ORDERS SHOULD BE “REALISTIC AND ACHIEVABLE”

September 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

One aspect of the Denton decision that is often overlooked, but which was very welcome, was the Court of Appeal’s message to the courts (and the parties) that any directions given should be “realistic and achievable.”   WHAT WAS SAID…

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES STRUCK OUT: APPLICATION TO AMEND REFUSED: CLAIMANT FAILED TO USE THEIR LOAF AS CLAIM IS SLICED...

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES STRUCK OUT: APPLICATION TO AMEND REFUSED: CLAIMANT FAILED TO USE THEIR LOAF AS CLAIM IS SLICED…

September 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Damages, Members Content, Striking out, Summary judgment

The judgment of Mrs Justice Jefford in The Leicester Bakery (Holdings) Ltd v Ridge And Partners LLP [2020] EWHC 2430 (TCC) shows the necessity of being able to particularise a claim for damages. What it demonstrates is that, in claims…

THE COLLECTIVE NAME FOR HAND UPS: A "BLIZZARD"OR "HARASSMENT"? WHY IS IT JUDGES LIKE BREVITY SO MUCH?

THE COLLECTIVE NAME FOR HAND UPS: A “BLIZZARD”OR “HARASSMENT”? WHY IS IT JUDGES LIKE BREVITY SO MUCH?

September 22, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Written advocacy

In his speech to the Peter Taylor memorial lecture “Complexity and Obscurity in the Law, and how we might mitigate them.” Lord Justice Irwin observed  “there is a special ring in hell for the advocate who stands up at 10:31…

IF YOU ARE IN COURT AND NOT SPEAKING TO THE JUDGE: SHUT UP: "RIVAL TRIBES" IN THE COURTROOM NEVER HELP

IF YOU ARE IN COURT AND NOT SPEAKING TO THE JUDGE: SHUT UP: “RIVAL TRIBES” IN THE COURTROOM NEVER HELP

September 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Conduct, Members Content

There is one passage in the judgment in Município De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group Plc & Anor [2020] EWHC 2471 (TCC) that I had to read twice. It is something that emphasises the need to remember that the judge…

SEEK PERMISSION TO APPEAL PROMPTLY (AND TELL THE JUDGE ABOUT IT): "A close analysis of the parties' cases thus reveals a fractal pattern of progressively complex and ever-finer recursive detail of sharply declining significance."

SEEK PERMISSION TO APPEAL PROMPTLY (AND TELL THE JUDGE ABOUT IT): “A close analysis of the parties’ cases thus reveals a fractal pattern of progressively complex and ever-finer recursive detail of sharply declining significance.”

September 20, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Turner in  Município De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group Plc & Anor [2020] EWHC 2471 (TCC) discloses an unusual turn of events in relation to an appeal. It contains some important observations about the…

THE OTHER AMENDMENT TO THE FATAL ACCIDENTS ACT 1976: COHABITEES MAY HAVE TO SHARE BEREAVEMENT AWARD WITH PARENTS: SPOUSES MAY HAVE SHARE PAYMENT WITH COHABITEES

THE OTHER AMENDMENT TO THE FATAL ACCIDENTS ACT 1976: COHABITEES MAY HAVE TO SHARE BEREAVEMENT AWARD WITH PARENTS: SPOUSES MAY HAVE SHARE PAYMENT WITH COHABITEES

September 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Damages, Fatal Accidents, Members Content, Webinar

There is another amendment made to the Fatal Accidents  Act 1976 in relation to the people entitled to receive a bereavement award. This is quite technical, but could be important in a very limited class of cases. The amendment is…

UNSUCCESSFUL APPEAL "TO ESTABLISH THE LIBERTY OF INEBRIATED ENGLISH SUBJECTS TO BE ALLOWED TO LIE UNDISTURBED IN THEIR OWN VOMIT SOAKED CLOTHING"

UNSUCCESSFUL APPEAL “TO ESTABLISH THE LIBERTY OF INEBRIATED ENGLISH SUBJECTS TO BE ALLOWED TO LIE UNDISTURBED IN THEIR OWN VOMIT SOAKED CLOTHING”

September 18, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Members Content

In Pile v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police [2020] EWHC 2472 (QB) Mr Justice Turner dismissed the claimant’s appeal.  The claimant complained that police officers had removed her outer clothing and provided her with dry clothing at a time when…

CHANGES IN FATAL ACCIDENT ACT:  STATUTORY BEREAVEMENT AWARD EXTENDED TO  COHABITEES

CHANGES IN FATAL ACCIDENT ACT: STATUTORY BEREAVEMENT AWARD EXTENDED TO COHABITEES

September 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Damages, Fatal Accidents, Members Content, Webinar

The Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (Remedial) Order 2020 comes into force on the 6th October 2020. It extends the scope of people entitled to the statutory bereavement award, extending it to cohabitees.   THE ORDER The Order inserts the term…

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 84: HOW NOT TO MAKE A PART 36 OFFER THAT IS NOT VALID:

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 84: HOW NOT TO MAKE A PART 36 OFFER THAT IS NOT VALID:

September 17, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Part 36

You may not care to believe it but the title of this post is deliberate, there is a double negative and a lack of clarity.  This reflects  the ambiguities and uncertainties in many of the attempts at Part 36 offers…

FAKE LAW AND "COMPENSATION CULTURE": A REVIEW: "SPEND HALF-AN-HOUR WITH A PERSONAL INJURY LAWYER (SHOULD THAT MISFORTUNE BEFALL YOU)"

FAKE LAW AND “COMPENSATION CULTURE”: A REVIEW: “SPEND HALF-AN-HOUR WITH A PERSONAL INJURY LAWYER (SHOULD THAT MISFORTUNE BEFALL YOU)”

September 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Book Review, Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury

The Secret Barrister has written their second book “Fake Law”, looking at many of the misconceptions that surround the legal system.   Here are selected extracts from the chapter on “Your Health”.   It takes a critical look at the way in…

WITNESS EVIDENCE AND COUNTER-SCHEDULE STRUCK OUT AS INADMISSIBLE: THE PRINCIPLES APPLIED

WITNESS EVIDENCE AND COUNTER-SCHEDULE STRUCK OUT AS INADMISSIBLE: THE PRINCIPLES APPLIED

September 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

In Rahman v Rahman & Ors [2020] EWHC 2392 (Ch) Master Clark struck out part of the defendants’ witness evidence and counter-schedule.  The judgment provides a useful summary of when the court will strike out evidence and statements of case….

SETTING ASIDE  A REGULAR JUDGMENT: TWO HURDLES FOR THE APPLICANT TO CLEAR - AND EVEN THEN THERE CAN BE CONDITIONS

SETTING ASIDE A REGULAR JUDGMENT: TWO HURDLES FOR THE APPLICANT TO CLEAR – AND EVEN THEN THERE CAN BE CONDITIONS

September 16, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Members Content, Sanctions, Setting aside judgment

The judgment of Master Kaye in  Penta Ultimate Holdings Ltd & Anor v Storrier [2020] EWHC 2400 (Ch) is a reminder that a party attempting to set aside a regular judgment has two hurdles to clear: the test set out…

PART 18 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ABOUT DAMAGES REFUSED: "NEITHER REASONABLE OR PROPORTIONATE"

PART 18 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ABOUT DAMAGES REFUSED: “NEITHER REASONABLE OR PROPORTIONATE”

September 15, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

In Kings Security Systems Ltd v King & Anor [2019] EWHC 3620 (Ch) Master Kaye refused an application that a party provide further information in relation to damages. “Part 18 requests should be for the purpose of providing further information…

JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE GRANTED DEFENDANT PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW FROM ADMISSIONS: CHANGE OF LAW DID NOT JUSTIFY CHANGE OF STANCE

JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE GRANTED DEFENDANT PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW FROM ADMISSIONS: CHANGE OF LAW DID NOT JUSTIFY CHANGE OF STANCE

September 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Admissions, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In the judgment today in J v A South Wales Local Authority [2020] EWHC 2362 (Admin) Mr Justice Marcus Smith overturned a decision granting a defendant permission to withdraw admissions. ” changes in the law are to be anticipated, particularly…

COURT MAKES 5% REDUCTION IN SUCCESSFUL CLAIMANT'S COSTS RATHER THAN AN ISSUE BASED COSTS ORDER

COURT MAKES 5% REDUCTION IN SUCCESSFUL CLAIMANT’S COSTS RATHER THAN AN ISSUE BASED COSTS ORDER

September 14, 2020 · by gexall · in Conduct, Costs, Members Content, Part 36

This is the fourth look  this blog looks at the judgment in Essex County Council v UBB Waste (Essex) Ltd (No. 3) [2020] EWHC 2387.   This time we are looking at the question of whether there should be a deduction in…

CHILDREN AND PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION: WEBINAR 5th OCTOBER 2020

CHILDREN AND PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION: WEBINAR 5th OCTOBER 2020

September 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury, Webinar

This webinar looks at practical issues relating to children and personal injury litigation, including liability, damages and procedure. Details of how to book are available here.    This webinar looks at the practical implications of acting for children injured in…

DEFENDANT'S CONDUCT OF THE CASE LED TO INDEMNITY COSTS BEING PAID: MAKING ALLEGATIONS OF "NOT ACTING IN GOOD" FAITH: A SPECULATIVE & WEAK CASE: EXPERTS WITH A CONFLICT OF INTEREST

DEFENDANT’S CONDUCT OF THE CASE LED TO INDEMNITY COSTS BEING PAID: MAKING ALLEGATIONS OF “NOT ACTING IN GOOD” FAITH: A SPECULATIVE & WEAK CASE: EXPERTS WITH A CONFLICT OF INTEREST

September 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Conduct, Costs, Experts, Members Content

This is the third (but not the last) look at the judgment on costs  in Essex County Council v UBB Waste (Essex) Ltd (No. 3) [2020] EWHC 2387. The judge held that the defendant’s conduct of the case was such that…

DID A CLAIMANT DO BETTER THAN ITS OWN PART 36 OFFER? THE SECOND PART OF THE ESSEX CASE

DID A CLAIMANT DO BETTER THAN ITS OWN PART 36 OFFER? THE SECOND PART OF THE ESSEX CASE

September 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Members Content, Part 36

Continuing with the issues about Part 36 in  Essex County Council v UBB Waste (Essex) Ltd (No. 3) [2020] EWHC 2387 (TCC) looked at in the earlier post. The judge went on to consider whether the claimant had, in fact,…

DATE ON LETTER DID NOT PREVENT IT BEING A VALID PART 36 OFFER: NO ESTOPPEL IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF PART 36 OFFERS: HIGH COURT DECISION TODAY

DATE ON LETTER DID NOT PREVENT IT BEING A VALID PART 36 OFFER: NO ESTOPPEL IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF PART 36 OFFERS: HIGH COURT DECISION TODAY

September 11, 2020 · by gexall · in Costs, Members Content, Part 36

In Essex County Council v UBB Waste (Essex) Ltd (No. 3) [2020] EWHC 2387 (TCC) Mr Justice Pepperall considered arguments relating to the validity of Part 36 offers. He found that the offer the claimant made was a valid Part…

RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS WOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED (IF IT WAS NECESSARY) WHERE BREACH OF A PEREMPTORY ORDER WAS NOT SERIOUS OR SIGNIFICANT

September 10, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Members Content, Peremptory orders, Relief from sanctions

In  Kazakhstan Kagazy Plc & Ors v Zhunus & Ors [2020] EWHC 2431 (Comm) Mr Justice Henshaw held that a defendant had not breached a peremptory order and relief from sanctions was not required.  However he indicated that if there…

SENSIBLE COVID PRECAUTIONS TAKEN WHEN IMPLEMENTING A SEARCH ORDER: APPLICANT TAKES A VERY NUANCED APPROACH

SENSIBLE COVID PRECAUTIONS TAKEN WHEN IMPLEMENTING A SEARCH ORDER: APPLICANT TAKES A VERY NUANCED APPROACH

September 9, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Injunctions, Members Content

The judgment of Mr Justice Fordham in Calor Gas Ltd v Chorley Bottle Gas Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 2426 (QB) has some interesting observations about the way in which COVID affects both the way a hearing is held and…

FOOD FOR THOUGHT: THE BILLABLE HOUR COOKBOOK 2020: A CALL FOR RECIPES: BAKE YOUR CAKE AND THEN EAT IT…

September 8, 2020 · by gexall · in Charity, Members Content

There is to be a 2020 Billable Hour cookbook.  There is now a call for recipes covering a wide range of the culinary spectrum: vegetarian, vegan,meat, fish, desserts and cakes.  Details of how to submit your recipes are available here. …

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 83: PART 18 REQUESTS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 83: PART 18 REQUESTS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

September 8, 2020 · by gexall · in Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Part 18 requests are often misused.  The Practice Direction states “A Request should be concise and strictly confined to matters which are reasonably necessary and proportionate to enable the first party to prepare his own case or to understand the…

PROVING DAMAGES IN A FATAL CASE: THE COURT SHOULD LOOK AT THE "PRACTICAL REALITY": WIDOW DID HAVE A FINANCIAL DEPENDENCY WHERE HUSBAND HAD RUN A SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS

PROVING DAMAGES IN A FATAL CASE: THE COURT SHOULD LOOK AT THE “PRACTICAL REALITY”: WIDOW DID HAVE A FINANCIAL DEPENDENCY WHERE HUSBAND HAD RUN A SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS

September 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Damages, Fatal Accidents, Members Content

In Rix v Paramount Shopfitting Company Ltd [2020] EWHC 2398 (QB) Mr Justice Cavangh considered and applied an important principle in fatal accident damages.  The fact that the deceased person was running a successful business, and it went on trading …

JUDGE WAS RIGHT TO REFUSE CLAIMANT'S APPLICATION TO ADJOURN AND NOT TO ALLOW SINGLE WITNESS IN PLACE OF JOINT WITNESS: HIGH COURT DECISION TODAY

JUDGE WAS RIGHT TO REFUSE CLAIMANT’S APPLICATION TO ADJOURN AND NOT TO ALLOW SINGLE WITNESS IN PLACE OF JOINT WITNESS: HIGH COURT DECISION TODAY

September 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Expert evidence, Members Content

In Hinson v Hare Realizations Ltd (2) [2020] EWHC 2386 (QB)  Mr Justice Martin Spencer refused a claimant’s appeal where it was argued that a trial judge should have adjourned a trial and given the claimant permission to rely on…

PROTOCOL FOR INSOLVENCY AND COMPANY WORK AT CENTRAL LONDON COUNTY COURT: APPLICABLE FROM TODAY

PROTOCOL FOR INSOLVENCY AND COMPANY WORK AT CENTRAL LONDON COUNTY COURT: APPLICABLE FROM TODAY

September 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Remote hearings

A Protocol for insolvency and company work at Central London applies from today. It is set out in full below. It sets out details for remote hearings of bulk and other work made necessary by the pandemic. “PROTOCOL FOR INSOLVENCY…

"LITIGATION WISHFUL THINKING": A REMINDER OF ITS IMPORTANCE

“LITIGATION WISHFUL THINKING”: A REMINDER OF ITS IMPORTANCE

September 7, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Members Content, Witness statements

This blog has looked many times at those cases where a case is determined by the judge’s assessment of the credibility of the witnesses.  This does not always (or event often) mean that the losing side are not telling the…

PROVING THINGS 182: FAILING TO PROVE A CONTRACT WAS SIGNED AND GETTING DAMAGES OF £1: NOT A GREAT RESULT FOR A CLAIMANT

PROVING THINGS 182: FAILING TO PROVE A CONTRACT WAS SIGNED AND GETTING DAMAGES OF £1: NOT A GREAT RESULT FOR A CLAIMANT

September 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Members Content

The judgment of JJH Melissa Clarke, sitting as a High Court Judge, in DPA (London) Ltd v D’Aguanno & Ors [2020] EWHC 2374 (IPEC) is a classic example of failing to prove key matters in a claim. Firstly the claimant…

SIMILAR WITNESS STATEMENTS (WITH THE SAME TYPOS) AND WITNESS CONFERRING WITH OTHERS: WHY “I SAY THE SAME AS THEM” RARELY HELPS

September 4, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

 In  the judgment today in Dr Jones Yeovil Ltd v The Stepping Stone Group Ltd [2020] EWHC 2308 (TCC)  HHJ Russen QC (sitting as a High Court judge) made some observations about the witnesses giving evidence.  The fact that some…

LETTER STATING THAT THE DEFENDANT CONSENTED TO SOME AMENDMENTS DID NOT OUST COURT'S JURISDICTION: TRY TO AMEND AT YOUR PERIL

LETTER STATING THAT THE DEFENDANT CONSENTED TO SOME AMENDMENTS DID NOT OUST COURT’S JURISDICTION: TRY TO AMEND AT YOUR PERIL

September 3, 2020 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

In  Scott & Ors v Singh [2020] EWHC 1714 (Comm) HHJ Eyre QC rejected an argument that a letter stating that the defendants agreed to some proposed amendments by the claimant meant that the court had no jurisdiction to prevent…

FATAL ACCIDENTS 2020: A SERIES OF WEBINARS TO HELP THOSE INVOLVED IN FATAL ACCIDENTS LITIGATION

September 3, 2020 · by gexall · in Fatal Accidents, Members Content, Webinar

Normally at this time of year I get together with Hilary Wetherell to present a one day course on fatal accidents.  There are obvious difficulties with giving  lectures this year. We are instead  series of webinars on the key issues…

THE EMPLOYER’S DUTY OF CARE IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES: WEBINAR 24th SEPTEMBER 2020

THE EMPLOYER’S DUTY OF CARE IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES: WEBINAR 24th SEPTEMBER 2020

September 3, 2020 · by gexall · in Members Content, Personal Injury, Webinar

On the 24th September 2020 I am presenting a webinar on the Employer’s Duty of Care in Personal Injury Cases. CONTENT Actions for breach of statutory duty were effectively curtailed by the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013. It is…

GUIDANCE ON GIVING REMOTE EVIDENCE: ESSENTIAL READING FROM THE ACADEMY OF EXPERTS

GUIDANCE ON GIVING REMOTE EVIDENCE: ESSENTIAL READING FROM THE ACADEMY OF EXPERTS

September 3, 2020 · by gexall · in Applications, Coronavirus, Expert evidence, Experts, Members Content, Remote hearings, Useful links

The Academy of Experts have written Guidance on Giving Remote Evidence. Although this is aimed at expert witnesses there is much that anyone involved in litigation can take away from this.   SELECTED EXTRACTS There is much that is useful. …

"PREPARED IN A WAY THAT MAKES ME ASHAMED OF MY PROFESSION": ENSURING WITNESS STATEMENTS ARE ACCURATE IS AN IMPORTANT TASK - IF YOU WANT TO KEEP YOUR JOB...

“PREPARED IN A WAY THAT MAKES ME ASHAMED OF MY PROFESSION”: ENSURING WITNESS STATEMENTS ARE ACCURATE IS AN IMPORTANT TASK – IF YOU WANT TO KEEP YOUR JOB…

September 2, 2020 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Damages, Members Content, Witness statements

There are nearly 800 posts on this blog that deal with  issues relating to witness statements.  The importance of ensuring that a statement is accurate is seen in the judgment of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal in SRA -v- Gilfillan, available…

TWO WEBINARS ON LOSS OF EARNINGS: RECENT CASES: OGDEN 8: CHILDREN: THE SELF EMPLOYED: SPORTSPEOPLE AND ENTERTAINERS

TWO WEBINARS ON LOSS OF EARNINGS: RECENT CASES: OGDEN 8: CHILDREN: THE SELF EMPLOYED: SPORTSPEOPLE AND ENTERTAINERS

September 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury, Webinar

I am presenting two webinars on the specific issue of loss of earnings in personal injury claims.  The first, on the 9th September 2020, looks at recent cases, the impact of Ogden 8, claims for disability in the labour market…

CIVIL PROCEDURE (CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP - AUGUST 2020

CIVIL PROCEDURE (CORONAVIRUS): BLOG AND ARTICLES ROUND UP – AUGUST 2020

September 1, 2020 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Coronavirus, Members Content, Useful links

A round up of blog posts and articles relating to civil procedure and coronavirus for August 2020. Remote Hearings Stewarts – Divisional Court judgment offers lessons for virtual trials   Litigation Litigation Futures – NHS, solicitors and patients group agree Covid-19 claims…

1 2 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 35.2K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • COSTS GROUP AT KINGS CHAMBERS – LOOKING FOR NEW MEMBERS: SEE THE ADVERT HERE
  • MAZUR RECORDING – NOW AVAILABLE
  • MAZUR MATTERS 10: THE STATUTORY DEFENCE TO THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE: WHY YOU (PROBABLY) WON’T GO TO JAIL: BUT THE POSITION GOING FORWARD MAY BE DIFFERENT…
  • THE JUDGE WAS RIGHT TO ALLOW A WASTED COSTS APPLICATION AGAINST THE CLAIMANT’S SOLICITORS TO PROCEED TO STAGE 2: MUCH TO THINK ABOUT HERE FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS (AND INDEED ANYONE WHO DRAFTS PLEADINGS)
  • MAZUR MATTERS 9: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE “CONDUCT OF LITIGATION”? (2): AN EARLY COURT OF APPEAL DECISION WHICH HELPS

Top Posts

  • MAZUR MATTERS 10: THE STATUTORY DEFENCE TO THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE: WHY YOU (PROBABLY) WON'T GO TO JAIL: BUT THE POSITION GOING FORWARD MAY BE DIFFERENT...
  • MAZUR RECORDING - NOW AVAILABLE
  • MAZUR MATTERS 9: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "CONDUCT OF LITIGATION"? (2): AN EARLY COURT OF APPEAL DECISION WHICH HELPS
  • MAZUR MATTERS 8: WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "CONDUCT OF LITIGATION" (1): HOW HELPFUL ARE THE REGULATORS?
  • THE JUDGE WAS RIGHT TO ALLOW A WASTED COSTS APPLICATION AGAINST THE CLAIMANT'S SOLICITORS TO PROCEED TO STAGE 2: MUCH TO THINK ABOUT HERE FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS (AND INDEED ANYONE WHO DRAFTS PLEADINGS)

Archives

Blogroll

  • Coronavirus: Guidance for lawyers and businesses
  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2023
  • Website of 4 – 5 Gray's Inn Square
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2025. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2025 Civil Litigation Brief

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.