CIVIL EVIDENCE: “BARE ASSERTIONS” ARE INSUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH A DISPUTED DEBT NOR WILL “VAGUE AND UNPARTICULARISED” EVIDENCE

This case serves as a reminder that, if a debt is to be disputed, then the evidence in support of the denial has to be particularised and credible.  Here the respondents faced a debt of  £920,000. There was an attempt to dispute this, however the judge found that the evidence in support was far from...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below