WHEN CHAT GPT DRAFTED A “SKELETON” ARGUMENT – 300 PAGES AND 132,000 WORDS LONG: THE LITIGANT RETAINS RESPONSIBILITY AND MUST COMPLY WITH THE RULES

We have here another example, in a judgment today, of the difficulties caused by the use of AI. ChatGPT "helpfully" drafted a "skeleton" argument that was 300 pages long (the maximum page length allowed was 20 pages).  This was coupled with an attempt by the appellant to pass on responsibility by de...

Enjoying this post?

Become a Civil Litigation Brief member to read full articles and access all premium content.

Become a member

Already a member? Log in below