BRITISH GAS HAS PRODUCED SOME HOT AIR: DENTON APPLIED NOT CONVERTED
I have already seen several headlines, and numerous commentaries, that mention the “hard line” taken by the Court of Appeal in British Gas Trading -v- Oak Cash & Carry Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 153. The case is not as draconian as…
DELAY, DISCRETION AND SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT
In the judgment today in Albesher -v- Ryan [2016] EWHC 541 (Comm) Mr Justice Walker considered issues of delay in an application to set aside a default judgment. KEY POINTS A regular judgment was set aside because there was…
REVISITING COMPLIANCE WITH A PEREMPTORY ORDER AFTER TRIAL: LIES ARE FOUND OUT AND ACTION DISMISSED
I am grateful to Jeff Turton of Weightmans for sending me a copy of the transcript in the case of Anward -v- Severn Trent Water Ltd (13th July 2015). Abid Anwar – Full Judgment It raises an interesting and important point…
DENTON CRITERIA OVERRIDES ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION: A WAKE UP CALL FOR THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY?
In Gentry -v- Miller and UK Insurance Company [2016] EWCA Civ 141 the Court of Appeal held that the fact that a defendant was alleging fraud did not entitle it to any special treatment in relation to breaches of rules….
A GENTLE REMINDER OF YOUR NEW YEAR'S RESOLUTIONS 3: THINK VERY CAREFULLY BEFORE SIGNING A STATEMENT OF TRUTH ON BEHALF OF A CLIENT
As part of the series reminding litigators of the new year’s resolutions for 2016 we look at resolution number 4: “Think very carefully before signing a statement of truth on behalf of a client”. We have already seen one case…
INTERIM PAYMENTS, EVIDENCE AND THE BURDEN OF PROOF: OBSERVATIONS FROM THE HIGH COURT
In Sellar-Elliot -v- Howling [2016] EWHC 443 (QB) Mr Justice Sweeney considered some important issues in relation to interim payments. The case is somewhat unusual in that the judgment is one that refuses permission to appeal. However the judge recognised…
REPRESENTATION IN CIVIL COMMITTAL PROCEEDING: ANOTHER CASE
Shortly after the previous post about legal aid in committal proceedings the decision in Watson -v- Holman [2016] EW Misc B5 was placed on Bailli. The case involved committal applications for failure to comply with an order to remove a…
APPROVAL HEARINGS: CLAIMANTS SHOWING ADVICES TO THE DEFENDANT: A VERY PECULIAR PRACTICE
This is a post inspired by a twitter conversation. It started as a general issue about children and approval hearings. During the course of the discussion it became clear that there were some claimant solicitors who as a matter of course…
DENTON DOES NOT APPLY TO DELAY IN PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENT
I am grateful to Simon Anderson of Park Square Barristers for his note of the judgment of Deputy District Judge Hill yesterday (4th March 2016) in the case of Martin -v- The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. This decision is…
IMPORTANT CHANGES TO COSTS BUDGETING: THE KEY POINTS
New rules in relation to costs budgeting come into force on the 6th April 2016. They apply to proceedings commenced on or after 6th April 2016. EXEMPTION FOR CHILDREN 5. In rule 3.12(1), for subparagraph (c), substitute— “(c) where in…
THERE IS NO SPECIAL RULE FOR PUBLIC AUTHORITIES: SECRETARY OF STATE NOT GRANTED PERMISSION TO APPEAL OUT OF TIME
The previous post emphasised the point that state agencies have no preferred status when it comes to compliance with rules and relief from sanctions. This point was made clear again by the Court of Appeal judgment in The Secretary of…
A "DISTURBING" APPROACH TO COMPLIANCE: STATE AGENCIES HAVE NO PREFERRED STATUS
The judgment of the Court of Appeal in BPP Holdings -v- The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2016] EWCA Civ 121, contains some observations in relation to compliance that are of general relevance. Not least everyone litigating on…
THE SOLICITOR, THE LIQUIDATOR AND THE CFA: STEVENSDRAKE THE JUDGMENT AT TRIAL
In Stevensdrake -v- Hunt [2016] EWHC 342 (Ch) His Honour Judge Simon Barker QC (sitting as a judge of the High Court) decided that, despite the clear wording of a conditional fee agreement, the defendant was not personally liable to…
CONTESTED APPLICATION TO TRANSFER TO THE FINANCIAL LIST
In Property Alliance Group Limited -v- Royal Bank of Scotland PLC [2016] ~EWHC 207 (Ch) Sir Terence Atherton considered a contested application to transfer proceedings into the Financial List. There is a useful explanation as to the scope of the…
A SPLIT TRIAL ON A PRELIMINARY ISSUE: ANOTHER CAUTIONARY TALE
A post earlier this month looked at the dangers of a court ordering a trial on a preliminary issue on a point of law. Similar concerns were raised by Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart in Water Lilly Co Ltd -v- Clin [2016] EWHC…
THE IMPACT OF PROCEDURE UPON SUBSTANTIVE LAW: KNAUER -v- MOJ
I have written elsewhere about the impact of the Supreme Court decision in Knauer v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 9. It is interesting to look at one short part of the judgment to reflect how changes to procedure can have…
THE SHORTER TRIALS SCHEME: SCOPE AND PROCEDURE
The Shorter Trial Scheme is both interesting and exciting. Providing as it does a possible blueprint for getting appropriate cases to trial much quicker, and a much lower costs. The scheme is discussed in detail in the short judgment of…
HEARING AN APPLICATION FOR PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE AFTER PROCEEDINGS ARE ISSUED: FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS
An earlier post considered the question whether an application for pre-action disclosure can properly be made after proceedings were issued. This issue was considered again by HHJ Moloney QC (sitting as a judge of the High Court) in Anglia Research…
LORD CHANCELLOR GETS A BONUS: THE POWERFUL RESULTS OF A CLAIMANT'S PART 36 OFFER
There are many interesting issues in the judgment of Mr Justice Holgate in The Lord Chancellor -v- Charles Ete & Co [2016] EWHC 275 (QB) which may be interesting to examine at a later date. However one significant point was…
DISCLOSURE AND PREDICTIVE CODING: PYHRRO EXPLAINED FOR THE TYRO
There has been much written already in relation to the decision of Master Matthews in Pyrrho Investments Ltd -v- MWB Property Ltd [2016] EWHC 256 (Ch) [see the links below]. However I want to concentrate upon the fact that this…
MONEY JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AFTER BREACH OF PEREMPTORY ORDER
In Rubin -v- Parsons [2016] EWHC 237 (Ch) Mr Justice Peter Smith considered the effect of breach of peremptory order in a case where the applicants were claiming much more complex relief. It shows that a much more calibrated approach…
CIVIL JUSTICE: COMING TO A CALL CENTRE NEAR YOU – SOON
So 86 courts are to close. The Written Ministerial Statement asserts that “over 97% of citizens will be able to reach their required court within an hour by car”. Putting aside the fact that 22% of women and 17% of…
THIS IS A SORRY TALE OF WOE:SPECULATIVE SKELETON ARGUMENTS ARE OF NO ASSISTANCE
In Lokhova -v- Tymula [2016] EWHC 225(QB) Mr Justice Dingemans set out a sorry tale of procedural issues in relation to applications in a defamation action. There are important observations in relation to co-operation; service of witness evidence and the…
ORDERING A SPLIT TRIAL ON PRELIMINARY ISSUES: A CAUTIONARY TALE
In Larkfleet -v- Allison Homes Eastern Limited [2016] EWHC 195 (TCC) Mr Justice Fraser made some important observations about the need for total clarity when a court orders the trial of a preliminary issue of law. ‘Preliminary points of law…
PROVING THINGS 1: CIVIL EVIDENCE ACT NOTICES WILL NOT CUT IT
The really surprising thing about going to court (for some people) is that, you have to prove things. Judges work on the basis of evidence. On the whole judges prefer live evidence from witnesses who are cross-examined. I The case…
IN LITIGATION, AS IN LIFE, THINGS WILL GO WRONG: HAVING A STRATEGY IN PLACE
There has been a lot of publicity recently about lawyers who have been struck off for, effectively, making things up to cover up mistakes. In the most recent case a time limit was missed for the First Tier Tribunal and…
THE MEANING OF THE WORD "CLAIM": A PSYCHOLOGICAL PHENOMENON
In Global Flood Defence Systems -v- Johan Den Noort Beheer BV [2016] EWHC 189 (IPEC) His Honour Judge Hacon was considering an issue very specific to the Intellecutal Property Enterprise Court. However the observations are interesting and may be of…
WHAT IS A TRIAL? AND WHY DOES IT MATTER?
In Pickard -v- Roberts [2016] EWHC 187 (Ch) Mr John Baldwin QC (Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the Chancery Division) had to consider whether a hearing was a “trial” and whether this had any impact upon the decision to…
EXTENDING TIME FOR SERVICE OF THE CLAIM FORM: A RISKY BUSINESS
In Medhi Kohsravi -v- British American Tobacco PLC [2016] EWHC 123 (QB)Sir David Eady stated that he would have set aside an order extending time for service of the claim form. It is a timely warning that obtaining an extension…
LATE AMENDMENT ALLOWED: TRIAL DATE MOVED: A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE
In G -v- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Appeal [2016] EWHC 104 (QB) Mrs Justice May granted the claimant permission to amend the Particulars of Claim even though this meant moving a 7 day trial listed in early April…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS, "MATERIALITY" & CONSIDERING THE MERITS IN A DEFAULT JUDGMENT: APPEAL AGAINST REFUSAL OF RELIEF ALLOWED
In Joshi & Welch Limited -v- Tay Foods [2015] EWHC 3905 (QB) Mr Justice Green allowed an appeal where the judge a first instance refused to grant relief from sanctions. Much centred on the definition of the word “material”. The…
COSTS AFTER A SPLIT TRIAL: PART 36; UNNECESSARY EXPERT REPORTS; PROPORTIONALITY AND USELESS BUNDLES: ALL LITIGATION LIFE IS HERE
The short judgment of Mr Justice Males in C&S Associates UK Limited -v- Enterprise Insurance Company PLC [2016] EWHC 67 (Comm) encapsulates many of the problems of contemporary litigation. “It is important that those litigating in this court are aware…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS APPLICATIONS: 10 POINTS TO IMPROVE THE ODDS
It is now just over 18 months since the Denton decision. Cases in relation to relief from sanction are still being reported regularly. It is clear that default remains a problem and an issue within the civil courts. Further it…
LORD CHIEF JUSTICE'S REPORT 2015: CIVIL WORK
The Lord Chief Justice’s Report 2015 covers a number of issues. Of particular interest to civil practitioners. The Briggs Review is summarised. There is an emphasis on control of litigation costs and court fees “The Jackson review reforms have now…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: NO PERMISSION TO SERVE RESPONDENT'S NOTICE LATE
In Pipe -v- Spicerhaart Estate Agents Ltd [2016] EWHC 61 QB Mr Justice Sweeney refused permission to serve a Respondent’s notice late. “Against the background that this is a small claims case, the conduct of the Respondent in relation to…
DECISION NOT TO ADMIT LATE WITNESS EVIDENCE UPHELD BY THE COURT OF APPEAL
There is a brief report on Lawtel of the decision in Judges Sykes Frixous -v- Bhabra (CA 14/010/2016).* This provides another example of a party (unsuccessfully) trying to serve witness evidence late in the day. There are numerous posts on…
PART 36, THE COMPENSATION RECOVERY UNIT AND COSTS: A SIGNIFICANT COURT OF APPEAL DECISION
In Crooks -v- Hendricks Lovell Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 8 the Court of Appeal considered some significant issues in relation to the interrelationship between Part 36 and the CRU situation in personal injury cases. KEY POINTS A claimant who recovered…
A POTENTIAL BENEFICIARY CANNOT BRING AN ACTION ON BEHALF OF AN ESTATE
The facts in Haastrup -v- Okorie [2016] EWHC 12 (Ch) are somewhat complex. However they do bring home some important matters in relation to the need to have capacity to bring proceedings on behalf of an estate. The judgment of…
SERVICE BY EMAIL IS GOOD SERVICE: FAMILY COURT DECISION
Issues of electronic service are still relatively novel. Some interesting issues were addressed by Mostyn J in Maughan -v- Wilmot [2015] EWHC 29 (Fam). This is a family case where important observations are made in relation to service by email…
APPLICATIONS FOR PRE-ACTION DISCLOSURE MUST BE MADE PRE-ACTION (NOT A GREAT SURPRISE THIS)
In Personal Management Solutions Ltd -v- Gee 7 Group Wealth Limited [2015] EWHC 3859(Ch) Mr Justice Morgan decided that applications for pre-action disclosure must be made pre-disclosure. The court did not have jurisdiction to make such an application once proceedings…
FIXED COSTS, PART 36 AND THE PROTOCOL: A DIFFERENT OUTCOME
NB this decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal. Broadhurst -v- Tan [2016] EWCA Civ 94. The post earlier today on fixed costs after Part 36 offers led Benjamin Williams QC to, kindly, send me a decision of Smith -v-…
CIVIL COURTS STRUCTURE REVIEW: LINKS
The Civil Courts Structure Review has potentially profound changes to the structure of the civil courts. Here are links to the key documents The report itself is available here The Welcoming Statement is available here The press summary can be…
NEW EVIDENCE ALLOWED AFTER HEARING: A HIGH COURT DECISION
In Swift Advances PLc -v- Ahmed [2015] EWHC 3265 (Ch) Mr Justice Norris permitted new evidence to be adduced after evidence and submissions had been completed. “..it may be expected that courts will allow fresh evidence when to refuse it…
THE DANGERS OF NOT PAYING THE CORRECT COURT FEE: CASES BARRED BY LIMITATION BECAUSE WRONG COURT FEE WAS PAID
In Richard Lewis & Others -v- Ward Hadaway [2015] EWHC 3503 (Ch) Mr John Male QC summary judgment was given for the defendants on the grounds that a deliberate decision to pay an incorrect court fee on issue meant…
INADEQUATE WITNESS STATEMENTS, A "CULTURE OF NON-COMPLIANCE" AND THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE
The decision of District Judge Hickman in the small claims case of Thakar -v- The Secretary of State for Justice [2015] EW Misc B44 is one that is likely to attract a lot of attention given that it was a…
USING WITNESS STATEMENTS PREPARED IN ANOTHER ACTION: WHEN IS A "HEARING HELD IN PUBLIC"
CPR 32.12 prevents witness statements served in an action being used for any other purpose. However there is an exception when a statement is “put in evidence at a hearing held in public”. This issue was considered in Kimathi -v- Foreign…
PART 36: WHEN THE NORMAL COSTS PENALTIES MAY NOT APPLY
In Yentob -v-MGN Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1292 the Court of Appeal upheld a decision of the judge not to impose the normal penalties when a claimant failed to beat a Part 36 offer. KEY POINTS When a party fails…
SUPREME SANCTIONS IN THE SUPREME COURT: NO SECOND BITE OF THE CHERRY
The judgment of the Supreme Court in Thevarajah -v- Riordan [2015] UKSC 78 has been long anticipated since it related to the law relating to sanctions. In fact it is a decision in relation to a very narrow issues. The…
"TOTALLY HOPELESS" APPLICATION FOR DISCLOSURE;INADEQUATE WITNESS STATEMENTS;APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION REFUSED:ALL LEGAL LIFE IS HERE
The judgment of Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart in London Borough of Bromley -v- Heckel [2015] EWHC encompasses many of the themes regularly discussed in this blog. Proceedings were issued late;there was an inappropriate application for disclosure;the witness evidence was inadequate. Finally…
NO SPECIAL RULES FOR LITIGANTS IN PERSON: COSTS DO NOT FOLLOW THE EVENT FOLLOWING UNREASONABLE CONDUCT
Master Mathews faced an unusual scenario in Jones -v- Longley [2015] EWHC 3362 (Ch). This case highlights the fact that litigants in person are not subject to any special rules and are liable to have orders for costs made against…
You must be logged in to post a comment.