Civil Litigation Brief ®
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership Plans
  • Webinars
  • Login
Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers
Browse: Home » Civil Procedure » Page 10
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 26: VERY LATE APPLICATION TO AMEND REFUSED: APPLICANTS, TO SOME EXTENT, HOIST ON THEIR OWN PETARD OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE TRIAL DATE BEING AT RISK...

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 26: VERY LATE APPLICATION TO AMEND REFUSED: APPLICANTS, TO SOME EXTENT, HOIST ON THEIR OWN PETARD OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE TRIAL DATE BEING AT RISK…

July 29, 2025 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Here we look at a case where the court refused thee applicants’ application for permission to amend its particulars of claim.  There are many points of interest to litigators.  The application was made too late and, in any event, did…

AMENDMENTS TO ONLINE CIVIL MONEY CLAIMS PILOT COME INTO FORCE TODAY: PLUS AN IMPORTANT LETTER FROM HMCTS

AMENDMENTS TO ONLINE CIVIL MONEY CLAIMS PILOT COME INTO FORCE TODAY: PLUS AN IMPORTANT LETTER FROM HMCTS

July 29, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Mediation & ADR, Members Content, Rule Changes

The 187th Update Practice Direction Amendments come into force today.  These make changes to the Online Civil Claims Pilot.  These make important changes and should be read in conjunction with the letter from HMCTS dated 25th July 2025 which is…

"INADEQUATE REASONS" IN CIVIL JUDGMENTS: THE COURT OF APPEAL PROVIDES A PRIMER FOR JUDGES (AND SOME IMPORTANT POINTS FOR THE REST OF US)

“INADEQUATE REASONS” IN CIVIL JUDGMENTS: THE COURT OF APPEAL PROVIDES A PRIMER FOR JUDGES (AND SOME IMPORTANT POINTS FOR THE REST OF US)

July 28, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

Here we look at a Court of Appeal decision last week on inadequate reasons given in judgments. This has major practical implications for judges and practitioners. Appeals because of “inadequate” reasoning are those that are the most unfair to all…

A DEFENDANTS' FIRM OF SOLICITORS COULD LAWFULLY GIVE DETAILS OF CLAIMANTS IN SIMILAR CASES WHEN DEFENDING FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY CLAIMS

A DEFENDANTS’ FIRM OF SOLICITORS COULD LAWFULLY GIVE DETAILS OF CLAIMANTS IN SIMILAR CASES WHEN DEFENDING FUNDAMENTAL DISHONESTY CLAIMS

July 23, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Fundamental Dishonesty, Members Content, Personal Injury, Witness statements

Here we are looking at a case where claimants brought an action claiming that their data protection rights had been breached by a defendant firm of solicitors. The defendant had collated a list of claimants who had relied on a…

DRAFTING WITNESS STATEMENTS: WHEN THE WITNESS HAS NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE MATTERS THEY RELY ON: HE "SHOULD HAVE CHECKED THE UNDERLYING DOCUMENTS HIMSELF".

DRAFTING WITNESS STATEMENTS: WHEN THE WITNESS HAS NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE MATTERS THEY RELY ON: HE “SHOULD HAVE CHECKED THE UNDERLYING DOCUMENTS HIMSELF”.

July 21, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Witness statements

There is an apparently never ending series of cases in which witness statements are used in circumstances where, in reality, the maker of that statement has no first hand knowledge of the matters stated. This often only becomes apparent at…

WHAT TO DO WHEN THINGS GO WRONG IN LITIGATION 2025: WEBINAR 4th AUGUST 2025

WHAT TO DO WHEN THINGS GO WRONG IN LITIGATION 2025: WEBINAR 4th AUGUST 2025

July 18, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Relief from sanctions, Webinar, Witness statements

One of the most aggravating things to read about in the legal press are those cases where people get into serious disciplinary trouble after having made a procedural or other mistake. It is not the mistake that has caused their…

COST BITES 258: DOES THE FACT THAT ONE OF THE UNSUCCESSFUL DEFENDANTS IS A LITIGANT IN PERSON MEAN THAT THEY SHOULD PAY LESS COSTS? AN ISSUE CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

COST BITES 258: DOES THE FACT THAT ONE OF THE UNSUCCESSFUL DEFENDANTS IS A LITIGANT IN PERSON MEAN THAT THEY SHOULD PAY LESS COSTS? AN ISSUE CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

July 18, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Conduct, Costs, Litigants in person, Members Content

If there are two unsuccessful defendants to an action and one of them is a litigant in person – should this have any impact on the costs order that costs order the court makes? This was an issue considered by…

WHEN A SOLICITOR FORGETS TO SIGN AN IMPORTANT PART OF AN APPEAL DOCUMENT: CAN CPR 3.10 SAVE THE DAY? A TRICKY POINT TO WATCH IN FORM N161

WHEN A SOLICITOR FORGETS TO SIGN AN IMPORTANT PART OF AN APPEAL DOCUMENT: CAN CPR 3.10 SAVE THE DAY? A TRICKY POINT TO WATCH IN FORM N161

July 17, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

CPR 3.10 is a rule often asked to so some “heavy lifting” by applicants who have not complied with the rules or court orders.  Sometimes it is not capable of handling the load, particularly in relation to issues surrounding service…

MEMBER NEWS: MORE ON THE "BACK CATALOGUE 2": THE FIRST 100 POSTS ON "PROVING THINGS": "IF YOU DON'T PROVE IT YOU DON'T GET IT"

MEMBER NEWS: MORE ON THE “BACK CATALOGUE 2”: THE FIRST 100 POSTS ON “PROVING THINGS”: “IF YOU DON’T PROVE IT YOU DON’T GET IT”

July 16, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Damages, Relief from sanctions, Witness statements

The “Proving things” series has proven to be very resilient and very long lasting. It started in February 2016 and, as of today, there are 267 posts under this heading.  More often than the matters covered relate to “not proving…

THE RULES AND GUIDANCE RELATING TO NON-PARTY DISCLOSURE CONSIDERED AND APPLIED: "THE EXCEPTION RATHER THAN THE RULE"

THE RULES AND GUIDANCE RELATING TO NON-PARTY DISCLOSURE CONSIDERED AND APPLIED: “THE EXCEPTION RATHER THAN THE RULE”

July 15, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Disclosure, Members Content, Witness statements

We are returning to the issue of non-party disclosure, indeed to the same case as the previous post. That post highlighted the Master’s concerns about the way in which claimant’s application had been conducted.  The same judgment also contains a…

HOW NOT TO MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR NON-PARTY DISCLOSURE - AN OBJECT LESSON: "THE APPLICATION WAS... FATALLY FLAWED FROM THE OUTSET AND SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN MADE"

HOW NOT TO MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR NON-PARTY DISCLOSURE – AN OBJECT LESSON: “THE APPLICATION WAS… FATALLY FLAWED FROM THE OUTSET AND SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN MADE”

July 15, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Disclosure, Members Content, Witness statements

Today we are looking at a case that everyone involved in making an application for non-party disclosure should read. The Master was highly critical of the applicant’s conduct of the application and the evidence in support. It proved to be…

INTRODUCING THE NEW CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF "TOOLBOX" SERIES : WHERE'S THE BEST PLACE TO FIND WHAT YOU WANT

INTRODUCING THE NEW CIVIL LITIGATION BRIEF “TOOLBOX” SERIES : WHERE’S THE BEST PLACE TO FIND WHAT YOU WANT

July 15, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Relief from sanctions, Useful links

One of the purposes of this site is as a working “toolbox” for practitioners.  To provide a useful and readily accessible source of information when particular issues arise. For that reason something new is starting on this site in the…

COURT REFUSES TO GRANT A DEFENDANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS WHEN AN ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE WAS FILED (VERY) LATE: ALSO REJECTS "BRAVE" SUBMISSION THAT THIS WAS A "TECHNICAL" BREACH

COURT REFUSES TO GRANT A DEFENDANT RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS WHEN AN ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE WAS FILED (VERY) LATE: ALSO REJECTS “BRAVE” SUBMISSION THAT THIS WAS A “TECHNICAL” BREACH

July 14, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions, Service of the claim form

There are dozens, possibly hundreds, of posts on this site about the application of the Denton criteria and relief from sanctions.  We have another case here. A defendant applied for relief from sanctions when the acknowledgment of service was filed…

CHANGES TO RULES OF ACCEPTING SERVICE BY EMAIL: SOME VERY MODEST PROPOSALS: (AND BYE BYE TO THE FAX MACHINE)

CHANGES TO RULES OF ACCEPTING SERVICE BY EMAIL: SOME VERY MODEST PROPOSALS: (AND BYE BYE TO THE FAX MACHINE)

July 14, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

The current consultation by the Civil Procedure Rule Committee relates to important issues of service that have featured many times in the courts, and on this site.  Here we look at the issues being considered relation to the automatic agreement…

"HALLUCINATED CASES" LEAD TO PARTY SUCCEEDING AT FIRST INSTANCE: THE COURT OF APPEALS OVERTURNS THE DECISION - BUT RESPONDENT RELIED ON ANOTHER HALLUCINATED CASE IN AN ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN COSTS...

“HALLUCINATED CASES” LEAD TO PARTY SUCCEEDING AT FIRST INSTANCE: THE COURT OF APPEALS OVERTURNS THE DECISION – BUT RESPONDENT RELIED ON ANOTHER HALLUCINATED CASE IN AN ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN COSTS…

July 14, 2025 · by gexall · in Advocacy, Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Conduct, Members Content, Written advocacy

Here we look at another case where a party to litigation relied on “hallucinated” cases – created by Artificial Intelligence.  The impact of those cases here were potentially more profound in that a party’s case – based on those false…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 24: COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS WHEN A TRIAL JUDGE CAN GO OUTSIDE THE PLEADED CASE: THERE IS A SPECTRUM

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 24: COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS WHEN A TRIAL JUDGE CAN GO OUTSIDE THE PLEADED CASE: THERE IS A SPECTRUM

July 11, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

In this judgment today the Court of Appeal consider, in detail, whether it is appropriate for a judge to go outside the pleaded case. The judgment provides guidance for the practice to be adopted if the judge feels that they…

PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE NEWS 3: INADEQUATE ATTENDANCE NOTE LEADS TO WOEFUL RESULTS: THE APPEAL THAT SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED

PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE NEWS 3: INADEQUATE ATTENDANCE NOTE LEADS TO WOEFUL RESULTS: THE APPEAL THAT SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED

July 10, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Professional negligence,

Here we are looking at a decision where manifold service failures on the part of solicitors were identified.  However we will look at one issue – the consequences of an attendance note not being full and complete. Counsel advised on…

"LESS IS MORE" WHEN DRAFTING NOTICES OF APPEAL: THE "KITCHEN SINK" APPROACH  DOES NOT PERSUADE THE COURT OF APPEAL TO GRANT PERMISSION

“LESS IS MORE” WHEN DRAFTING NOTICES OF APPEAL: THE “KITCHEN SINK” APPROACH DOES NOT PERSUADE THE COURT OF APPEAL TO GRANT PERMISSION

July 9, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Written advocacy

When a Lord Justice of Appeal looks at a notice of appeal and skeleton and refers to a “kitchen sink” approach, we can probably surmise that a proposed appellant  is going to have some difficulty here. When of their colleagues…

COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS "BROUGHT FOR COLLATERAL PURPOSES"  DISMISSED: NOTICE TO SHOW CAUSE ISSUED AGAINST THE CLAIMANT'S SOLICITORS: WHY THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS STRATEGY

COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS “BROUGHT FOR COLLATERAL PURPOSES” DISMISSED: NOTICE TO SHOW CAUSE ISSUED AGAINST THE CLAIMANT’S SOLICITORS: WHY THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS STRATEGY

July 8, 2025 · by gexall · in Abuse of Process, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Committal proceedings, Conduct, Members Content, Wasted Costs

There are many ways in which a litigant, dissatisfied with a judgment of the court can respond. They can  apply to set the judgment aside; they can appeal; they can issue fresh proceedings attempting to argue that the action was…

ACTION STRUCK OUT BECAUSE CLAIMANT FAILED TO COMPLY PROPERLY WITH AN UNLESS ORDER FOR DETAILS OF FUNDING: DECISION UPHELD ON APPEAL

ACTION STRUCK OUT BECAUSE CLAIMANT FAILED TO COMPLY PROPERLY WITH AN UNLESS ORDER FOR DETAILS OF FUNDING: DECISION UPHELD ON APPEAL

July 8, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Peremptory orders, Relief from sanctions, Striking out

Here we look at a case where the Court of Appeal upheld a decision that the claimant had failed to comply with the terms of a peremptory order. The action was, therefore, struck out.  It is a salutary and important…

COST BITES 253: COURT OF APPEAL ALLOW APPEAL IN HOLCROFT -V- THORNEYCROFT SOLICITORS - BY CONSENT: AN "AGREEMENT" AS TO THE DEDUCTION OF COSTS DOES NOT PREVENT A SOLICITORS ACT ASSESSMENT

COST BITES 253: COURT OF APPEAL ALLOW APPEAL IN HOLCROFT -V- THORNEYCROFT SOLICITORS – BY CONSENT: AN “AGREEMENT” AS TO THE DEDUCTION OF COSTS DOES NOT PREVENT A SOLICITORS ACT ASSESSMENT

July 8, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

The case of  Holcroft -v- Thorneycroft has been discussed on this site in the past. The Court of Appeal has allowed an appeal, by consent, setting aside the original orders and directing that the defendants pay the costs of the …

SHOULD THE DEFENDANT PAY COSTS IMMEDIATELY AFTER A SPLIT TRIAL? THE "MEAN FIDDLER" CONSIDERED IN DETAIL

SHOULD THE DEFENDANT PAY COSTS IMMEDIATELY AFTER A SPLIT TRIAL? THE “MEAN FIDDLER” CONSIDERED IN DETAIL

July 7, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

For the second time within a few weeks we are looking at a case where the judge had to consider whether to make a costs order following a claimant being successful after a split trial.  Here the judge took a…

BANKRUPTCY PETITION DISMISSED: THE PRECISE SUMS DUE (IF ANY) COULD, AND SHOULD, BE DETERMINED IN THE COUNTY COURT

BANKRUPTCY PETITION DISMISSED: THE PRECISE SUMS DUE (IF ANY) COULD, AND SHOULD, BE DETERMINED IN THE COUNTY COURT

July 7, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Enforcement, Insolvency, Members Content

One way to enforce a debt higher than £5,000 is to issue a bankruptcy petition. However problems for the would be petitioner can occur if the debt is disputed. We see such a case here.  The judge held that there…

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 22: WHOLE BATCHES OF CASES STRUCK OUT BECAUSE THE PARTICULARS WERE DEFICIENT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED

THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 22: WHOLE BATCHES OF CASES STRUCK OUT BECAUSE THE PARTICULARS WERE DEFICIENT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED

July 7, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Peremptory orders, Relief from sanctions, Striking out

Here we are looking at a case where numerous actions brought by the claimant were struck out because the Particulars of Claim were wholly deficient.  They remained wholly deficient even after the court had made a peremptory order compelling the…

CHILDREN AND FATAL ACCIDENT LITIGATION 2025: WEBINAR 8th JULY 2025

CHILDREN AND FATAL ACCIDENT LITIGATION 2025: WEBINAR 8th JULY 2025

July 6, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Fatal Accidents, Webinar

There are particulars challenges and difficulties facing a practitioner in cases where children are the only or primary dependants in a fatal claim. This webinar addressed the key issues, in relation to the law, practice and procedure and helping with…

PART 36, REFUSAL TO MEDIATE AND SHOULD A PARTY BE SUBJECT TO THE PART 36 PENALTIES WHEN AN OFFER WAS MADE TO THREE DEFENDANTS?

PART 36, REFUSAL TO MEDIATE AND SHOULD A PARTY BE SUBJECT TO THE PART 36 PENALTIES WHEN AN OFFER WAS MADE TO THREE DEFENDANTS?

July 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil Procedure, Costs, Mediation & ADR, Members Content, Part 36

What should the court do in a case where a Part 36 offer is made in relation to a number of defendants but the claimant only succeeds against one of them?  Can a failure to accept an offer of mediation…

WHEN CAN A JUDGE HEAR AN ISSUE THAT IS NOT "LISTED"?  THE ISSUES CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

WHEN CAN A JUDGE HEAR AN ISSUE THAT IS NOT “LISTED”? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT

July 4, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Relief from sanctions

If an action is listed for hearing on a specific issue when can the judge hear, and make an order in relation to a different issue?   This is an issue considered in the case we are looking at here.  The…

COST BITES 251: POINTS OF DISPUTE MUST BE PROPERLY PARTICULARISED OR THEY WILL BE STRUCK OUT: HIGH COURT DECISION TODAY CONSIDERED

COST BITES 251: POINTS OF DISPUTE MUST BE PROPERLY PARTICULARISED OR THEY WILL BE STRUCK OUT: HIGH COURT DECISION TODAY CONSIDERED

July 3, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

There have been a number of cases now where the courts have considered the obligations on a party filing Points of Dispute to a bill of costs. In particular the need to be particular.  Those obligations are considered in detail…

WHEN HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF AS TRAGEDY & FARCE: GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS, MAKING WITNESS STATEMENTS AND THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF

WHEN HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF AS TRAGEDY & FARCE: GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS, MAKING WITNESS STATEMENTS AND THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF

July 3, 2025 · by gexall · in Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content, Witness statements

The post earlier today on the need for MI5 operatives to give the source of their information and belief has a ring of “intrigue” about it. James Bond, we now know, cannot simply declaim something to be true. However, as…

SPIES, LIES, INTRIGUE - AND A BASIC FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES RELATING TO WITNESS STATEMENTS: GIVING THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF (WE'VE COVERED THIS MANY TIMES BEFORE...)

SPIES, LIES, INTRIGUE – AND A BASIC FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES RELATING TO WITNESS STATEMENTS: GIVING THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF (WE’VE COVERED THIS MANY TIMES BEFORE…)

July 3, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Witness statements

Here we have a case about MI5, spies and lies.  However this is a site about civil procedure and evidence so we are  largely bypassing the intrigue and lies (but not the potential of a finding of contempt of court) …

MEMBER NEWS: THE SEARCH FACILITY ON THIS SITE AND FINDING RELATED MATERIAL

MEMBER NEWS: THE SEARCH FACILITY ON THIS SITE AND FINDING RELATED MATERIAL

July 2, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Useful links

It is now three weeks and a day since this site took up the membership subscription model. It has been an interesting time. Not least it has enabled me to fully appreciate the full range of the site’s readership ,…

COST BITES 250: SHOULD THE CLAIMANT'S SOLICITOR BE ENTITLED TO RECOVER A FULL SUCCESS FEE AND THE ATE PREMIUM? A DECISION MADE ON APPEAL

COST BITES 250: SHOULD THE CLAIMANT’S SOLICITOR BE ENTITLED TO RECOVER A FULL SUCCESS FEE AND THE ATE PREMIUM? A DECISION MADE ON APPEAL

July 2, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Civil Procedure, Conditional Fee Agreements, Costs, Insurance premiums, Members Content, Personal Injury

We are looking at a decision made on appeal in relation to the very common issue of the percentage of a success fee and the taking out, and subsequent deduction from damages, of an After the Event Insurance policy.  The…

WHEN A PARTY MAKES A SECOND APPLICATION TO RELY ON EXPERT WITNESS HOW SHOULD THE COURT RESPOND? THE SAGA CONTINUED

July 2, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

We are looking at this case for the third time.   There were issues in relation to witness evidence and expert evidence. The problems continued after trial when the judge realised that neither party had addressed her on a mandatory requirement…

SECOND (AND THIRD) APPLICATIONS FOR RELIEF THAT ARE, ESSENTIALLY,  FOR THE SAME THING NOT ALLOWED TO PROCEED: THE APPLICATIONS WERE ABUSIVE

SECOND (AND THIRD) APPLICATIONS FOR RELIEF THAT ARE, ESSENTIALLY, FOR THE SAME THING NOT ALLOWED TO PROCEED: THE APPLICATIONS WERE ABUSIVE

July 1, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Peremptory orders, Relief from sanctions, Striking out

Here we are looking at a case where defendants, debarred from defending an action, made consecutive (and ultimately fruitless) applications to vary the orders that caused them to be debarred and several applications for relief from sanction.  The court was…

WHEN SHOULD THE COURT GRANT A PARTY AN OPEN-ENDED STAY TO AWAIT EXTERNAL DEVELOPMENTS?  THE ISSUE AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED

WHEN SHOULD THE COURT GRANT A PARTY AN OPEN-ENDED STAY TO AWAIT EXTERNAL DEVELOPMENTS? THE ISSUE AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED

June 30, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Members Content

When should the court grant a party a stay because that  party asserts  there may be external developments which are relevant to the issues the court has to consider?  That was a question considered in this case. There is a…

FURTHER UPDATES TO HMCTS GUIDANCE ON USING THE DAMAGES CLAIM PORTAL: RAISING QUERIES WITHIN SYSTEM; INFORMING THE PORTAL OF SETTLEMENT AND PARTIAL DISCONTINUANCE (NOT EXCITING, BUT IMPORTANT...)

FURTHER UPDATES TO HMCTS GUIDANCE ON USING THE DAMAGES CLAIM PORTAL: RAISING QUERIES WITHIN SYSTEM; INFORMING THE PORTAL OF SETTLEMENT AND PARTIAL DISCONTINUANCE (NOT EXCITING, BUT IMPORTANT…)

June 30, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content

A  few days (sometimes even a day)  can be a long time in civil procedure. I wrote about the updated Guidance to the Damages Claim Portal at the end of last week.  Today I am writing to tell you it…

PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE NEWS (1): I'VE SUED THE WRONG DEFENDANT:  CAN THE COURT DO ANYTHING TO HELP?  FIRST OF (WHAT MAY WELL BE) A LONG RUNNING SERIES

PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE NEWS (1): I’VE SUED THE WRONG DEFENDANT: CAN THE COURT DO ANYTHING TO HELP? FIRST OF (WHAT MAY WELL BE) A LONG RUNNING SERIES

June 30, 2025 · by gexall · in Amendment, Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Professional negligence,

There is much to be said for starting a new (and what may well be a  long running) series looking at professional negligence cases, in particular the procedural and practical issues that arise.  Firstly, if (as here) it is a…

HOW SHOULD THE COURT EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION TO CASE MANAGE ACTIONS ONCE PART 8 PROCEEDINGS ARE ISSUED UNDER THE PAP? COURT OF APPEAL GIVES CLEAR GUIDANCE

HOW SHOULD THE COURT EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION TO CASE MANAGE ACTIONS ONCE PART 8 PROCEEDINGS ARE ISSUED UNDER THE PAP? COURT OF APPEAL GIVES CLEAR GUIDANCE

June 27, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Extensions of time, Members Content, Personal Injury

Having determined that the court does have jurisdiction to case manage actions issued under Part 8 the Court of Appeal went on to make some trenchant observations in relation to avoiding the possibility of delay. (Applications to extend a stay…

PROVING THINGS 267: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS FINDING THAT COUNCIL HAD ESTABLISHED ITS STATUTORY DEFENCE: SOME VERY IMPORTANT POINTS HERE ABOUT THE USE OF STATEMENTS PUT TO WITNESSES AND JUDICIAL FACT FINDING

PROVING THINGS 267: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS FINDING THAT COUNCIL HAD ESTABLISHED ITS STATUTORY DEFENCE: SOME VERY IMPORTANT POINTS HERE ABOUT THE USE OF STATEMENTS PUT TO WITNESSES AND JUDICIAL FACT FINDING

June 26, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Costs, Members Content, Personal Injury, Witness statements

Here we are looking at an important decision of the Court of Appeal. On the face of it it is about a defendant’s failure to prove a statutory defence. However, perhaps more significantly, it is about evidence, the impact of…

CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CORNER 1: ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING IN A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE: IT HELPS IF THE PSLA IS IN THE SCHEDULE

CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CORNER 1: ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING IN A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE: IT HELPS IF THE PSLA IS IN THE SCHEDULE

June 26, 2025 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Clinical Negligence, Damages, Members Content, Personal Injury, Professional negligence,

It is relatively rare for litigators to get a detailed insight into the court’s approach to an award for pain and suffering.  We see any example here. Of course every case is fact specific, but practitioners have to be aware…

COST BITES 247: SHOULD A SOLICITOR RESPOND TO PART 18 QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PAYMENT OF COMMISSION? THE HIGH COURT CONSIDERS THE POINT TODAY

COST BITES 247: SHOULD A SOLICITOR RESPOND TO PART 18 QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PAYMENT OF COMMISSION? THE HIGH COURT CONSIDERS THE POINT TODAY

June 26, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Applications, Assessment of Costs, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs, Members Content

Here we are looking at another round in the solicitor-own client assessment war of attrition.   The question was whether a solicitor, in a solicitor and own client assessment, should reply to Part 18 requests for further information about premiums paid…

THE STATUS OF PRACTICE DIRECTIONS CONSIDERED : "I AM UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE NOTION THAT A PRACTICE DIRECTION CAN HAVE THE EFFECT OF OVERTAKING THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT..."

THE STATUS OF PRACTICE DIRECTIONS CONSIDERED : “I AM UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE NOTION THAT A PRACTICE DIRECTION CAN HAVE THE EFFECT OF OVERTAKING THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT…”

June 26, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil Procedure, Members Content

The precise legal status of Practice Directions is interesting.  Here we have a case where a judge considered their status and came to a firm view that a statement made in the PD should not be followed as it was…

CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE CONSIDERED: CASES IN THE COURTS IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS: WEBINAR 1ST JULY 2025

CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE CONSIDERED: CASES IN THE COURTS IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS: WEBINAR 1ST JULY 2025

June 26, 2025 · by gexall · in Personal Injury, Webinar

It is commonplace for defendants to make allegations of contributory negligence against an injured claimant.  Litigators working in this field need to know the basic law and principles relating to contributory negligence and also how these are being applied in…

A COUNTERCLAIM WAS CORRECTLY STRUCK OUT AFTER A CLAIM WAS STRUCK OUT FOR DELAY: "APPROBATING", "REPROBATING" AND "TECHNICAL WAREHOUSING" CONSIDERED

A COUNTERCLAIM WAS CORRECTLY STRUCK OUT AFTER A CLAIM WAS STRUCK OUT FOR DELAY: “APPROBATING”, “REPROBATING” AND “TECHNICAL WAREHOUSING” CONSIDERED

June 26, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Striking out

Here we have a case where the defendant unsuccessfully appealed against the striking out of its counterclaim. The claimants had consented to the claim being struck out, on the defendant’s application,  due to undue delay in the action.  The defendant…

BANK'S CLAIM AGAINST SOLICITORS FOR "CAUSING LOSS BY UNLAWFUL MEANS" IS NOT STRUCK OUT, NOR ARE THE SOLICITORS GRANTED SUMMARY JUDGMENT: A LOT TO THINK ABOUT HERE

BANK’S CLAIM AGAINST SOLICITORS FOR “CAUSING LOSS BY UNLAWFUL MEANS” IS NOT STRUCK OUT, NOR ARE THE SOLICITORS GRANTED SUMMARY JUDGMENT: A LOT TO THINK ABOUT HERE

June 25, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Striking out, Summary judgment, Witness statements

We are looking at a judgment from today where a bank has brought a claim against a firm of solicitors arguing that they have caused the bank loss because of the number and nature of complaints made by the solicitors’…

IS THIS APPEAL "ACADEMIC" AND SHOULD IT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED? COURT OF APPEAL DONS ITS THINKING CAP...

IS THIS APPEAL “ACADEMIC” AND SHOULD IT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED? COURT OF APPEAL DONS ITS THINKING CAP…

June 25, 2025 · by gexall · in Appeals, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

We are looking at this Court of Appeal decision for the second time. Here we look at the Court’s consideration of an argument that an appeal should not proceed because the arguments were “academic”.  There are important points considered here…

URGENT MESSAGE FROM H M COURTS AND TRIBUNAL SERVICE THIS MORNING: HMCTS PLATFORM IS STOPPING USERS FROM UPLOADING DOCUMENTS: WHAT TO DO IF UPLOADING IS URGENT

URGENT MESSAGE FROM H M COURTS AND TRIBUNAL SERVICE THIS MORNING: HMCTS PLATFORM IS STOPPING USERS FROM UPLOADING DOCUMENTS: WHAT TO DO IF UPLOADING IS URGENT

June 25, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content

For those who have missed the email from HMCTS it is important to note that the HMCTS platform is not working at the moment. The email from HMCTS below makes practical suggestions as to what should be done if uploading…

DOES THE HEADING MATTER? IS A PART 18 REQUEST VALID IF IT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE RULES?

DOES THE HEADING MATTER? IS A PART 18 REQUEST VALID IF IT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE RULES?

June 23, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Statements of Case

What should the court’s approach be if a party serves a Part 18 request but, for various reasons,  it does not comply with the rules?  The respondent to the request in this case took the point.  The Master had to…

NO RELIEF FOR CLAIMANTS WHO SERVED THE CLAIM FORM LATE:  TAKING A POINT AS TO SERVICE IS NOT "PLAYING TECHNICAL GAMES"

NO RELIEF FOR CLAIMANTS WHO SERVED THE CLAIM FORM LATE: TAKING A POINT AS TO SERVICE IS NOT “PLAYING TECHNICAL GAMES”

June 20, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil Procedure, Members Content, Service of the claim form, Serving documents

It may be possible for a month to go by without a mis-service of the claim form issue arising in the courts, but it is not this month.  We have here a case with the familiar litany of waiting to…

ANOTHER CASE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND "HALLUCINATED CASES": PLUS THERE MAY BE "MISCHIEF" IN THE BACKGROUND

ANOTHER CASE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND “HALLUCINATED CASES”: PLUS THERE MAY BE “MISCHIEF” IN THE BACKGROUND

June 19, 2025 · by gexall · in Applications, Avoiding negligence claims, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Members Content

A few weeks ago I was cagey in reporting a case about AI generated false authorities because I could not believe any lawyer could do this and was wary of the accuracy (indeed authenticity)  of the report. Today I am…

← Previous 1 … 9 10 11 … 26 Next →

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Subscription notifies you of a new post, it does not give you access to members' content.

Join 12.3K other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • DO LAWYERS (AND EXPERTS) LIKE CHECKLISTS THAT ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULES? WELL, I MAY HAVE A TREAT FOR YOU TOMOPRROW
  • SERVICE POINTS 45: A SOLICITOR FAILS TO CHECK THE CE FILE AND 5,000 CLAIMS GO UP IN SMOKE: SEVERAL IMPORTANT LESSONS HERE, INCLUDING THE NEED TO MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR RELIEF PROMPTLY…
  • WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A PARTY DOES NOT RESPOND TO A NOTICE TO ADMIT FACTS (THERE IS NO “DEEMED ADMISSION”) PLUS ANOTHER POSSIBLE “HALLUCINATED” “FICTITIOUS” RULE
  • RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED: SOME DELAYS WERE UNEXPLAINED AND THERE WERE OTHER BREACHES OF THE RULES: SOME LESSONS ON COMPLIANCE HERE…
  • COST BITES 393: A CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN LAW FIRMS WAS VALID: THERE WAS NO BREACH (AND IF THERE WAS IT WAS NOT MATERIAL): FRESH OFF THE PRESS – JUDGMENT THIS AFTERNOON

Top Posts

  • A FIRM OF SOLICITORS ISSUED PROCEEDINGS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO DO SO: ORDERED TO PAY £900,000 ON ACCOUNT OF COSTS: SOME EXPENSIVE LESSONS HERE...
  • COST BITES 386: THREATS TO REPORT THE DEFENDANTS' SOLICITORS TO THE SRA WAS ONE OF THE REASONS THE CLAIMANT HAD TO PAY COSTS ON AN INDEMNITY BASIS: WEAPONISERS BEWARE
  • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE CITATION OF MISLEADING AUTHORITIES: ANOTHER WEEK, ANOTHER CASE: IF YOUR NAME IS ON THE DOCUMENT YOU "OWN" IT...
  • THROWBACK FRIDAY: LAWYERS FAILURE TO PROVIDE OVERSIGHT OF EXPERTS LEADS TO EXCLUSION OF THEIR EVIDENCE: EXPERT EVIDENCE IS “NOT A MATTER OF RIGHT” (MAY 2021)
  • COST BITES 385: THE COURTS SHOULD BE WARY OF DECIDING PRELIMINARY APPLICATIONS AND ISSUES ON A PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENT: THIS COULD UNDERMINE THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF THE REGIME

Archives

Blogroll

  • Fatal Accident Law
  • Legal Futures
  • Personal injury: Liability and Damages

Books

  • Munkman & Exall on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death 15th ed
  • The APIL Guide to Fatal Accidents 4th edition

Useful Links

  • Buntools (for preparing PDF Bundles)
  • Kings Chambers
  • Kings Chambers Costs & Litigation Funding
  • Kings Chambers Serious Injury
  • The Civil Procedure Rules
  • The Law Society Gazette
  • The National Archives Recently Published Judgments
  • The Senior Court Costs Office Guide 2025
  • www.Bailii.org

Copyright

© Gordon Exall, Exall Legal Training, Civil Litigation Brief, 2013-2026. Unauthorised use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission is strictly prohibited.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Membership Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Copyright
  • Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Civil Litigation Brief ®

Powered by Big Yellow Workshop

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.