THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 22: WHOLE BATCHES OF CASES STRUCK OUT BECAUSE THE PARTICULARS WERE DEFICIENT: RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS REFUSED
Here we are looking at a case where numerous actions brought by the claimant were struck out because the Particulars of Claim were wholly deficient. They remained wholly deficient even after the court had made a peremptory order compelling the…
CHILDREN AND FATAL ACCIDENT LITIGATION 2025: WEBINAR 8th JULY 2025
There are particulars challenges and difficulties facing a practitioner in cases where children are the only or primary dependants in a fatal claim. This webinar addressed the key issues, in relation to the law, practice and procedure and helping with…
PART 36, REFUSAL TO MEDIATE AND SHOULD A PARTY BE SUBJECT TO THE PART 36 PENALTIES WHEN AN OFFER WAS MADE TO THREE DEFENDANTS?
What should the court do in a case where a Part 36 offer is made in relation to a number of defendants but the claimant only succeeds against one of them? Can a failure to accept an offer of mediation…
WHEN CAN A JUDGE HEAR AN ISSUE THAT IS NOT “LISTED”? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT
If an action is listed for hearing on a specific issue when can the judge hear, and make an order in relation to a different issue? This is an issue considered in the case we are looking at here. The…
COST BITES 251: POINTS OF DISPUTE MUST BE PROPERLY PARTICULARISED OR THEY WILL BE STRUCK OUT: HIGH COURT DECISION TODAY CONSIDERED
There have been a number of cases now where the courts have considered the obligations on a party filing Points of Dispute to a bill of costs. In particular the need to be particular. Those obligations are considered in detail…
WHEN HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF AS TRAGEDY & FARCE: GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS, MAKING WITNESS STATEMENTS AND THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF
The post earlier today on the need for MI5 operatives to give the source of their information and belief has a ring of “intrigue” about it. James Bond, we now know, cannot simply declaim something to be true. However, as…
SPIES, LIES, INTRIGUE – AND A BASIC FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES RELATING TO WITNESS STATEMENTS: GIVING THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND BELIEF (WE’VE COVERED THIS MANY TIMES BEFORE…)
Here we have a case about MI5, spies and lies. However this is a site about civil procedure and evidence so we are largely bypassing the intrigue and lies (but not the potential of a finding of contempt of court) …
MEMBER NEWS: THE SEARCH FACILITY ON THIS SITE AND FINDING RELATED MATERIAL
It is now three weeks and a day since this site took up the membership subscription model. It has been an interesting time. Not least it has enabled me to fully appreciate the full range of the site’s readership ,…
COST BITES 250: SHOULD THE CLAIMANT’S SOLICITOR BE ENTITLED TO RECOVER A FULL SUCCESS FEE AND THE ATE PREMIUM? A DECISION MADE ON APPEAL
We are looking at a decision made on appeal in relation to the very common issue of the percentage of a success fee and the taking out, and subsequent deduction from damages, of an After the Event Insurance policy. The…
WHEN A PARTY MAKES A SECOND APPLICATION TO RELY ON EXPERT WITNESS HOW SHOULD THE COURT RESPOND? THE SAGA CONTINUED
We are looking at this case for the third time. There were issues in relation to witness evidence and expert evidence. The problems continued after trial when the judge realised that neither party had addressed her on a mandatory requirement…
SECOND (AND THIRD) APPLICATIONS FOR RELIEF THAT ARE, ESSENTIALLY, FOR THE SAME THING NOT ALLOWED TO PROCEED: THE APPLICATIONS WERE ABUSIVE
Here we are looking at a case where defendants, debarred from defending an action, made consecutive (and ultimately fruitless) applications to vary the orders that caused them to be debarred and several applications for relief from sanction. The court was…
WHEN SHOULD THE COURT GRANT A PARTY AN OPEN-ENDED STAY TO AWAIT EXTERNAL DEVELOPMENTS? THE ISSUE AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES CONSIDERED
When should the court grant a party a stay because that party asserts there may be external developments which are relevant to the issues the court has to consider? That was a question considered in this case. There is a…
FURTHER UPDATES TO HMCTS GUIDANCE ON USING THE DAMAGES CLAIM PORTAL: RAISING QUERIES WITHIN SYSTEM; INFORMING THE PORTAL OF SETTLEMENT AND PARTIAL DISCONTINUANCE (NOT EXCITING, BUT IMPORTANT…)
A few days (sometimes even a day) can be a long time in civil procedure. I wrote about the updated Guidance to the Damages Claim Portal at the end of last week. Today I am writing to tell you it…
PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE NEWS (1): I’VE SUED THE WRONG DEFENDANT: CAN THE COURT DO ANYTHING TO HELP? FIRST OF (WHAT MAY WELL BE) A LONG RUNNING SERIES
There is much to be said for starting a new (and what may well be a long running) series looking at professional negligence cases, in particular the procedural and practical issues that arise. Firstly, if (as here) it is a…
HOW SHOULD THE COURT EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION TO CASE MANAGE ACTIONS ONCE PART 8 PROCEEDINGS ARE ISSUED UNDER THE PAP? COURT OF APPEAL GIVES CLEAR GUIDANCE
Having determined that the court does have jurisdiction to case manage actions issued under Part 8 the Court of Appeal went on to make some trenchant observations in relation to avoiding the possibility of delay. (Applications to extend a stay…
PROVING THINGS 267: COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS FINDING THAT COUNCIL HAD ESTABLISHED ITS STATUTORY DEFENCE: SOME VERY IMPORTANT POINTS HERE ABOUT THE USE OF STATEMENTS PUT TO WITNESSES AND JUDICIAL FACT FINDING
Here we are looking at an important decision of the Court of Appeal. On the face of it it is about a defendant’s failure to prove a statutory defence. However, perhaps more significantly, it is about evidence, the impact of…
CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CORNER 1: ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING IN A CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASE: IT HELPS IF THE PSLA IS IN THE SCHEDULE
It is relatively rare for litigators to get a detailed insight into the court’s approach to an award for pain and suffering. We see any example here. Of course every case is fact specific, but practitioners have to be aware…
COST BITES 247: SHOULD A SOLICITOR RESPOND TO PART 18 QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PAYMENT OF COMMISSION? THE HIGH COURT CONSIDERS THE POINT TODAY
Here we are looking at another round in the solicitor-own client assessment war of attrition. The question was whether a solicitor, in a solicitor and own client assessment, should reply to Part 18 requests for further information about premiums paid…
THE STATUS OF PRACTICE DIRECTIONS CONSIDERED : “I AM UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE NOTION THAT A PRACTICE DIRECTION CAN HAVE THE EFFECT OF OVERTAKING THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT…”
The precise legal status of Practice Directions is interesting. Here we have a case where a judge considered their status and came to a firm view that a statement made in the PD should not be followed as it was…
CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE CONSIDERED: CASES IN THE COURTS IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS: WEBINAR 1ST JULY 2025
It is commonplace for defendants to make allegations of contributory negligence against an injured claimant. Litigators working in this field need to know the basic law and principles relating to contributory negligence and also how these are being applied in…
A COUNTERCLAIM WAS CORRECTLY STRUCK OUT AFTER A CLAIM WAS STRUCK OUT FOR DELAY: “APPROBATING”, “REPROBATING” AND “TECHNICAL WAREHOUSING” CONSIDERED
Here we have a case where the defendant unsuccessfully appealed against the striking out of its counterclaim. The claimants had consented to the claim being struck out, on the defendant’s application, due to undue delay in the action. The defendant…
BANK’S CLAIM AGAINST SOLICITORS FOR “CAUSING LOSS BY UNLAWFUL MEANS” IS NOT STRUCK OUT, NOR ARE THE SOLICITORS GRANTED SUMMARY JUDGMENT: A LOT TO THINK ABOUT HERE
We are looking at a judgment from today where a bank has brought a claim against a firm of solicitors arguing that they have caused the bank loss because of the number and nature of complaints made by the solicitors’…
IS THIS APPEAL “ACADEMIC” AND SHOULD IT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED? COURT OF APPEAL DONS ITS THINKING CAP…
We are looking at this Court of Appeal decision for the second time. Here we look at the Court’s consideration of an argument that an appeal should not proceed because the arguments were “academic”. There are important points considered here…
URGENT MESSAGE FROM H M COURTS AND TRIBUNAL SERVICE THIS MORNING: HMCTS PLATFORM IS STOPPING USERS FROM UPLOADING DOCUMENTS: WHAT TO DO IF UPLOADING IS URGENT
For those who have missed the email from HMCTS it is important to note that the HMCTS platform is not working at the moment. The email from HMCTS below makes practical suggestions as to what should be done if uploading…
DOES THE HEADING MATTER? IS A PART 18 REQUEST VALID IF IT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE RULES?
What should the court’s approach be if a party serves a Part 18 request but, for various reasons, it does not comply with the rules? The respondent to the request in this case took the point. The Master had to…
NO RELIEF FOR CLAIMANTS WHO SERVED THE CLAIM FORM LATE: TAKING A POINT AS TO SERVICE IS NOT “PLAYING TECHNICAL GAMES”
It may be possible for a month to go by without a mis-service of the claim form issue arising in the courts, but it is not this month. We have here a case with the familiar litany of waiting to…
ANOTHER CASE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND “HALLUCINATED CASES”: PLUS THERE MAY BE “MISCHIEF” IN THE BACKGROUND
A few weeks ago I was cagey in reporting a case about AI generated false authorities because I could not believe any lawyer could do this and was wary of the accuracy (indeed authenticity) of the report. Today I am…
SHOULD SKELETON ARGUMENTS BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PRESS (AND OTHERS) ?: ADVOCATES MUST BE PREPARED
Is a person attending a public hearing entitled to sight of the skeleton arguments being used? Is disclosure confined to the press? What should happen if the skeleton refers to matters that fall foul of reporting restrictions? These are important…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 17: WHAT DOES THE WORD “PORNOGRAPHY” MEAN WHEN INCLUDED IN A PLEADING? COURT OF APPEAL CONSIDERS THE ISSUE TODAY
This series has taken an unexpected turn. I didn’t expert to be writing about a Court of Appeal decision that considered the precise pleaded meaning of the word “pornography”, but that is precisely what we are doing here. A decision…
WHICH EXPERT WITNESS IS GOING TO BE PREFERRED? ONE EXPERT TOOK AN “UNREALISTIC APPROACH”
Knowing the reasons why a judge may prefer the evidence of one expert over another is an important part of a litigator’s skill. Each case is, of course, fact specific, but there are clear trends that can be discerned. Here…
WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES WHEN A WITNESS BREAKS THE “PURDAH” RULES? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT
The “purdah” rule – that a witness cannot discuss the case and their evidence with others, including their legal team, once they have started giving evidence is of utmost significance. Here we are looking at a case where a witness…
WASTED COSTS ORDER MADE AGAINST SOLICITORS WHO HAD PURSUED A “HOPELESS” CASE: ATTEMPTS TO RELY ON PRIVILEGE WERE A RESORT TO A MERE “FIG LEAF”
It is rare for a wasted costs order to be made against a solicitor for pursuing what is seen as a “hopeless” case. However we have such an order in the case we are considering here. The Master found the…
THE RULES OF COURT DO NOT ALLOW A PARTY TO COMPEL ITS OPPONENT TO EXPLAIN HOW ERRORS WERE MADE IN WITNESS STATEMENTS:
Can the court compel a party to file a witness statement explaining, in detail, why mistakes were made in earlier witness statements? That was the issue considered in the case we are looking at today. The judge considered the provisions…
A COURT ORDER SO AMBIGUOUS THAT IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO ENFORCE : SOME ESSENTIAL POINTS ABOUT DRAFTING HERE
Here we are looking at a Court of Appeal decision about the drafting and construction of court orders. The order made in this case was totally deficient, consequently it could not be enforced. (Absolute precision is demanded here…) “……
INDEMNITY COSTS ORDERED AGAINST SOME (BUT NOT ALL) CLAIMANTS: A NUANCED HIGH COURT DECISION
We are returning to the same case as the previous post but looking at a different issue. The judge considered whether to make an order for indemnity costs against the claimants. The case is unusual in that such an award…
AN IMPORTANT POINT ABOUT TRIAL BUNDLES: REDACTION SHOULD NOT NORMALLY TAKE PLACE: IT MAKES THE COURT’S JOB MORE DIFFICULT
There is always room for another case about bundles on this site. It is a subject of endless fascination to most litigators, and endless frustration for many judges. Here we are looking at a case where the trial judge observed…
WHAT COSTS REGIME APPLIES WHERE A JUDGE FINDS THAT A SUCCESSFUL CLAIMANT SHOULD HAVE USED THE LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY PORTAL? THE ISSUES CONSIDERED ON APPEAL
For the second time this week we are looking at the issue of whether, or not, it was reasonable for a claimant’s solicitor to conclude that a matter should have been commenced outside the Low Value Personal Injury Portal. This…
LAWYERS HEAVILY CRITICISED IN A JUDGMENT: COURT OF APPEAL REFUSES PERMISSION TO APPEAL: A CASE THAT BRISTLES WITH CONDUCT AND PROCEDURAL ISSUES
We have a case here where a solicitor and KC involved in a case were heavily criticised by the trial judge. The solicitor attempted to appeal those findings and the Court of Appeal considered, among many other things, their Article…
CIVIL PROCEDURE BACK TO BASICS 104: YOU CAN’T ACT ON BEHALF OF BOTH SIDES IN LITIGATION – YOU REALLY CAN’T
How does one firm act on behalf of both sides in litigation? Entering judgment for a claimant and then applying, on behalf of the defendant, to have that judgment set aside? The easy answer is that it can’t. This…
PROVING THINGS 263: “IT IS A FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE OF LITIGATION THAT A CLAIMANT MUST PROVE THEIR LOSS… THEY MUST ALSO SATISFY THE COURT AS TO THE AMOUNT OF ANY LOSS WHICH THEY HAVE SUFFERED”
This series has now covered hundreds of examples where litigants have failed to prove their case. We are looking at another example here where a counterclaiming defendant adduced no substantive evidence of a claim said to be worth nearly £500,000. …
SOME QUICK NOTES ABOUT CORPORATE SUBSCRIPTIONS: NEW GROUP NUMBERS ADDED – YOU CAN NOW SUBSCRIBE FOR UP TO 1,000 SEATS (AND MORE BY ARRANGEMENT)
A number of people have been in touch asking whether the site can accommodate larger groups than those set out in the original plan (someone has asked whether there can be “limitless” numbers on a subscription). As a result of…
“ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE” ON TRIAL: WHEN QUESTIONED CHAT GPT WILL TELL YOU ITS MADE THINGS UP: THIS IS “A HALLUCINATION RATHER THAN A REAL LEGAL AUTHORITY”
Artificial Intelligence and legal “research” has been very much in the news of late. I am grateful to my colleague Steven Turner for sending me an example where, upon being questioned, Chat GPT readily conceded that a case it had…
BECOME A MEMBER TO KEEP UP TO DATE: THIS SITE IS BECOMING A MEMBERSHIP SUBSCRIBER SITE – MAKING CLB BIGGER AND BETTER
On the 10th June 2025* this site is becoming a membership site. All the past posts, and the vast majority of future posts will only be available to members who have joined. This post explains what readers need to do…
SAD NEWS: THE DEATH OF DISTRICT JUDGE BRANCHFLOWER
I was saddened to learn yesterday of the death of District Judge George Branchflower. This is a sad loss to his family, his friends and the legal profession. GEORGE’S ROUTE TO THE BAR George had an unusual route to…
CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 3: THE PROBLEMS, THE GUIDANCE AND THE PENALTIES: PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE HAS A MAXIMUM SENTENCE OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT…
We are returning to (and not for the last time) to the Divisional Court judgment in relation to the citation of false authorities due to the use of Artificial Intelligence. The Court reviews the dangers, the guidance and the sanctions…
CITING FALSE CASES TO THE COURT 2: A LAWYER IS NOT ENTITLED TO RELY ON THEIR LAY CLIENT FOR THE ACCURACY OF CITATIONS OF AUTHORITY
We are continuing with the examination of the Court’s judgment in relation to cases where false authorities have been cited as a result of a reliance on false authorities, generated by artificial intelligence. Here we have a case where the…
CITING “FALSE” CASES TO THE COURT 1: JUDGMENT ON THE CONTEMPT OF COURT HEARINGS 1: THE CASE OF AYINDE
This blog has already considered the case of Frederick Ayinde, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Haringey [2025] EWHC 1040 (Admin) on several occasions. False (presumably AI generated) authorities were put before the court. That case,…
THE CURRENT IMPORTANCE OF PLEADINGS 15: THE CLAIMANT HAD NOT PLEADED AN ISSUE SHE WANTED TO RELY ON AT TRIAL: THE ISSUE WAS “NOT PURSUED”
This series is giving rise to more cases than I initially thought. Here we look at an example of a claimant wishing to pursue a specific line of argument but having to accept that it was not pleaded and that…
PARTS OF WITNESS STATEMENT STRUCK OUT – THIS “CARRIES NO WEIGHT AS EVIDENCE”:DOORS FIRMLY SHUT IN RELATION TO INADMISSIBLE COMMENTARY
If we had a pound for every word in witness statements served in just one single month that was irrelevant or inadmissible we could probably go a long way to paying off the national debt. The costs, however, are probably…
THE CLAIMANT DID NOT NEED TO ANSWER THE PART 18 REQUESTS MADE: THESE REQUESTS ARE AKIN TO THE “PRE CPR-PROCEDURE”
There have been a number of cases recently relating to Part 18 questions and questions to experts. Here we are looking at a case where the defendant raised numerous requests to the claimant and sought a peremptory order when it…
You must be logged in to post a comment.