A WITNESS STATEMENT FROM SOMEONE WITHOUT CAPACITY CAN STILL BE ADMITTED AS EVIDENCE : WITNESS EVIDENCE CONSIDERED IN THE HIGH COURT
The case of Milroy -v- British Telecommunications PLC [2015] EWHC 532 (QB) is an important decision in terms of the analysis of the employer’s duty to provide training. However it also contains some interesting observations from Mr Justice William Davis…
MITIGATING THE IMPACT OF THE COURT FEE INCREASE 3: ONLY CLAIM WHAT ITS WORTH AND WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO GET
This is the third in the series on mitigating the effect of court fees. The new fees regime makes clear the need for as much accuracy as possible in assessing what the likely award is going to be. An additional…
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS FOLLOWING LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS: ANOTHER EXAMPLE
In Sloutsker -v- Romanova [2015] EWHC 545 (QB) Warby J granted the claimant relief from sanctions after it failed to serve witness statements in time. THE CASE The claimants brought an action for libel. The defendant applied for orders setting…
THERE ARE NOW UNEXPLODED GRENADES IN YOUR FILING CABINET: SERVE PROCEEDINGS PROMPTLY AND PROPERLY
One problem with the flurry of issuing proceedings last week is that there will now be numerous actions that have been issued which are not fully ready and where service will be delayed. Remember that un-served proceedings means that there…
IF YOU WANT A STAY PENDING APPEAL MAKE FULL AND TOTAL DISCLOSURE
In Goldsmith -v- O’Brien [2015] EWHC 510 (Ch) Judge Purle QC refused an application for a stay pending appeal. The case is an important reminder of the burden on a party seeking a stay pending appeal. THE CASE The claimant…
LITIGATION IS "VERY MUCH AN OPTIONAL ACTIVITY": HOW WOULD THE MO(I)J RESPOND TO "NON-OPTIONAL" LITIGANTS?
There is no greater sign of the MO(i)J’s lack of understanding of the reality of litigation than the statement, made in the House of Lords by Lord Faulks, that “litigation is very much an optional activity”. TELL THAT TO BUSINESSES…
WHEN BUNDLES & SANCTIONS COLLIDE: DAVIS -v- RAJA: FAILURE TO FILE APPEAL BUNDLE LEADS TO APPEAL BEING STRUCK OUT
In Davis Solicitors LLP -v- Raja [2015] EWHC 519 (QB) Mr Justice Supperstone refused the claimant relief from sanctions following a failure to comply with directions on appeal in relation to the filing of a bundle. There are important practical…
JUST A BIT MORE ON COURT FEES…
Given the importance of the next few hours I will keep this short. 1. Lexis Nexis Blog have an interview with Keith Etherington on “Beating the fee hike – by 4pm” 2. The Guardian reports Claimants expected to rush to…
MITIGATING THE IMPACT OF THE COURT FEE INCREASE 2: FEE REMISSION – EVERY LITIGATOR HAS TO KNOW THIS NOW
This is the second in the series of posts on mitigating the impact of the court fee increase. Not for the first time Kerry Underwood has got to this point already. I am not going to repeat anything Kerry says…
PETITION ABOUT THE INCREASE IN COURT FEES
There is a petition to the Ministry of Justice which can be signed on-line. WHY SIGN THE PETITION? Regular readers of this blog will know the importance. This is summarised in the petition document itself “WHY IS THIS PETITION IMPORTANT?…
FIVE MORE IMPORTANT POINTS FOR THOSE ISSUING IN HASTE
Friday is ( or may be) effectively the last day you can issue under the old fee regime. This is going to be a busy day for many litigators. Here are five points in an attempt to ensure that no…
FOUR IMPORTANT POINTS FOR THOSE HASTILY ISSUING PROCEEDINGS THIS WEEK
Twitter and other sources have been full of stories of solicitors issuing numerous proceedings to avoid the (wholly ridiculous) price hike next week. There are a few things that should be borne in mind by all those who have issued…
MORE ON THE ADVERSE IMPACT OF COURT FEE INCREASE: BLAME THE MO(i)J IF THE ECONOMY COLLAPSES
The impact of the court fee rise has reached the Global Legal Post with the headline that UK litigation specialist fear backlash against London over proposed court fee hike. However it is likely to have a major impact on SMEs…
YET MORE ON COURT FEES: SME'S AND "SECOND WAVE" OF PROPOSED INCREASES
There are more interesting posts on the impact of the new court fees regime. I propose to post on this issue regularly. If anyone has any comments, views or links please let me know. The SI itself (with the new…
MITIGATING THE IMPACT OF THE COURT FEES INCREASE 1: LIMITATION STANDSTILL AGREEMENTS
The general view of the court fee increases is well known. The increases are based on inadequate research and will have a major detrimental effect on the economy as well as the interests of justice. Since the increases are likely…
COURT FEES: IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENTS: IMPLEMENTATION DATE THE 9th MARCH
The Law Society Gazette reports that the implementation date for the revised Court Fees is likely to be the 9th March. It is interesting to look at recent developments and responses. OTHER DEVELOPMENTS Compare and contrast “Justice minister Shailesh Vara…
MORE ON INDEMNITY COSTS AND THE SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS AT TRIAL: INTERCITY TELECOMS -v- SOLANKI
NOTE THAT THIS JUDGMENT HAS BEEN OVERTURNED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL, SEE THE POST HERE In Intercity Telecom -v- Solanki [2015] Judge Simon Brown QC awarded indemnity costs and assessed costs at the end of a trial. It is…
THE LADD -v- MARSHALL TEST: WHAT IS MEANT BY "REASONABLE DILIGENCE": A TALE OF COMPUTERS IN COURT
An appeal court will only consider new evidence on very limited grounds. The test in Ladd -v- Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489 is that the applicant can show that the evidence could not with reasonable diligence have been obtained for…
Y0UR OPPONENT'S WITNESS STATEMENT CANNOT BE DISCLOSED UNTIL AFTER IT IS USED AT A HEARING IN PUBLIC: A USEFUL REMINDER
The judgment of Mr Justice Warby in Barry -v- Butler [2015] EWHC 447 (QB) contains some important reminders about witness statements. The witness statements received from an opposing party cannot be disclosed generally until they are used at a hearing…
NO RE-ALLOCATION AT THE COURT OF APPEAL STAGE JUST TO GET COSTS: CONLON -v- ROYAL SUN INSURANCE PLC
In Conlon -v- Royal Sun Insurance plc [2015] EWCA Civ 92 the Court of Appeal refused to re-allocate a costs at the appeal stage when the application was made solely for the purpose of attempting to recover costs. THE ISSUES…
SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT. DELAY AND THE DENTON CRITERIA: ANOTHER IMPORTANT CASE
In Avanesov -v- Shymkentpivo [2015] EWHC 394 (Comm) Mr Justice Popplewell considered the issue of setting aside judgment after a long period of delay by the defendant and the relevance of the Denton criteria. THE CASE The defendant applied to…
MORE ON BUNDLES: THERE IS MUCH TIME & MONEY TO BE SAVED YET
I have often commented (and been surprised) by the fact that a post on preparing trial bundles is always the most popular page on this blog. Following a prompt from Dominic Regan it was interesting to watch the live feed…
ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF A SUCCESSFUL DEFENDANT NOT RECOVERING ALL OF ITS COSTS (AND OF THE ADVANTAGES OF A PART 36 OFFER)
In Altus Group (UK) Limited -v- Baker Tilly [2015] EWHC 411 (Ch) HH Judge Keyser QC (sitting as a High Court Judge) made various orders in relation to the Defendant’s costs. The Defendant did not recover all their costs of…
UNSUCCESSFUL APPEAL AGAINST GRANT OF RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: HOME GROUP LIMITED -v- MATREJEK
There may be a few appeals pending where a party is arguing that relief from sanctions should be granted on the grounds of the Denton criteria which “modified” the Mitchell test. The unusual aspect of the decision in Home Group…
DECIDING CASES ON PAPER: WOODLANDS, EVIDENCE & DECIDING CASES "ONLINE"
The decision in Woodland -v- Maxwell looked at in an earlier blog is interesting because it is one of the rare cases where the Court of Appeal carried out a (brief) analysis of the evidence in the case more than…
THE PROPOSED COURT FEE INCREASE: ACTION BY THE LAW SOCIETY – READ THE STATISTICS ABOUT ACCESS TO JUSTICE
The Law Society has sent a pre-action protocol letter for judicial review to challenge the government’s proposed increase in court fees. “State provision for people to redress wrongs through the courts is the hallmark of a civilised society.’ THE LAW…
PLEADINGS MUST BE CONCISE – OR ELSE! TOO MANY COUNSEL SPOILING THE BROTH?
We have looked before at problems caused by over-lengthy pleadings. In Vincent Aziz Tchenguiz -v- Grant Thornton UK LLP [2015] EWHC 405 (Comm) Mr Justice Leggatt provides a virtual “cut out and keep” set of warnings of the dangers of not complying…
CONSULTATION ON COURT FEES INCREASE : GET INVOLVED
As we all know there are proposals to increase court fees to (frankly ridiculous) amounts. It is important that everyone takes part in the consultation process. (Some may say that the MOJ is about to make the same counter-productive mistakes…
LENGTHY BUNDLES AND INTERIM COSTS: OBSERVATIONS FROM THE TECHNOLOGY & CONSTRUCTION COURT
The two judgments of Mr Justice Akenhead in the Secretary of State for the Home Environment -v- Raythean Systems Limited [2014] EWHC 4375 (TCC) and [2015] EWHC 311 (TCC) contain some familiar motifs in relation to the size of bundles,…
ANOTHER CASE WHERE INDEMNITY COSTS AWARDED – FOR PART OF THE CLAIM
There are now several posts on this blog considering the importance of an award for costs on an indemnity basis and cases where judges have considered this issue. Another example can be found in the decision of Stephen Jourdan QC…
SHOULD A SECOND ACTION BE STRUCK OUT AS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS? AN ISSUE COMING TO THE COURT OF APPEAL SOON
There is an important note in the news section of Hardwicke Chambers website. The Court of Appeal has granted permission to appeal in a case where the judge refused to strike out a second action issued after a first action…
MORE ON SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS & PROPORTIONALITY: NOT GOING FOR A SONG
The issue of proportionate costs was considered by Judge Behrens in Taylor -v- Bell & Haworth (16th February 2015). It provides a useful example of judicial comments in relation to disproportional costs. THE CASE The applicant was seeking a variation of…
WITHDRAWING FROM ADMISSIONS, MISTAKES AND THE DENTON PRINCIPLES
There is a report on Lawtel of the decision of Judge Bidder QC in Moore -v- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust [12/02/15].* This case demonstrates some of the difficult issues in relation to the law of withdrawing from admissions. THE…
FOR TWO DOLLARS MORE: THE DANGERS OF NOT SENDING THE CORRECT COURT FEE
I am grateful to Gerard McDermott QC for sending me details from the American Bar Association Journal of a £2.5 million case in Powhattan Circuit Court where a $2.5 million dollar action failed because the court fee was incorrect by…
IN A DOG EAT DOG WORLD MAKE SURE YOU GET YOUR WITNESS STATEMENTS RIGHT (OR DON'T LET YOUR WITNESSES RABBIT ON WITHOUT GOOD EVIDENCE)
The judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in Supreme Petfoods Limited -v- Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Limited [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) contains a detailed analysis of the law relating to trade marks. Thanks to technology the judgment contains some vivid…
SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: ANOTHER EXAMPLE: SAY IT WITH FLOWERS
We have looked, several times, at judgments which contain summary assessment of costs. Not least to get a flavour of the approach of the courts. An assessment took place by Mr Justice Birss in Interflora -v- Marks & Spencer…
WHAT THE JACKSON REPORT SAID ABOUT COURT FEES: TOO HIGH AND SHOULD BE USED TO IMPROVE CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM
The government, and the Ministry of Justice in particular, has been keen to advocate and implement the Jackson reports. The costs of litigation should be proportional and, in effect, this means reduced. However in all the discussions in relation to…
WHEN WILL INDEMNITY COSTS BE ORDERED? A HIGH COURT DECISION CONSIDERED
Indemnity costs now carry extra weight in that, on assessment, the court is not bound by the principle of proportionality. In Siegel -v- Pummell [2015] EWHC 195 (QB) Mr Justice Wilkie reviewed the relevant principles in relation to indemnity costs….
EARLY CONTENDERS FOR WORST PUNS ON CIVIL CASES 2015: YOU JUDGE THE STANDARD
In the annual review of civil litigation of 2014 there was an easy winner for the case that gave rise to the most, and worst, puns. There is an early contender for this award in 2015. Since this competition is…
GUIDANCE GIVEN AS COSTS BUDGETING IN PRACTICE: CONTINGENCIES, RATES AND TIMING: YEO -v- TIMES NEWSPAPERS LIMITED
The judgment of Mr Justice Warby in Tim Yeo MP -v- Times Newspapers Limited [2015] EWHC 209 (QB) contains some interesting observations in relation to pleading allegations of fraud. However here we look at the judge’s observations in relation to…
EVANS -v- WOLVERHAMPTON: PART 36: SERVICE OF NOTICE TO APPEAL AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS: IN THE REPORTS AGAIN
The case of Evans -v- The Royal Wolverhampton Hospital Trust [2014] EWHC 3185 (QB) has been examined before in this blog. It was the case where the defendant made an ex parte application for permission to withdraw a Part 36…
THE RIHANNA CASE AND COSTS: A QUICK CODA
The main judgment in the Rihanna case was considered in an earlier post which considered the problems caused by witnesses giving opinion evidence. There is a short supplementary judgment Fenty -v- Arcadia Group Brands Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 38 which…
CHILDREN & SUCCESS FEES: A POST-APRIL CHECKLIST & SOME DIFFICULT QUESTIONS
A previous post dealt with links to the rules and Practice Direction relating to success fees in children cases after the 6th April 2015. Here is a checklist of the relevant matters. CHECKLIST Prerequisites The action must have been settled…
CPR 3.9 AND EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO CHALLENGE REGISTRATION OF FOREIGN JUDGMENT: HIGH COURT CASE CONSIDERED
Mr Justice Jay considered CPR 3.9 and the Denton criteria in Satellite Communications Network Limited -v- Faisal Islamic Bank of Khartoom [2015] EWHC 4500 (QB). It deals with important points in relation to extensions of time under CPR 74.7 THE…
COSTS AGAINST NON-PARTIES: NOTHING LOST IN TRANSLATION: THE CAPITA CASE CONSIDERED
The decision today of Sir James Munby In the Matter of Capita Translation and Interpreting Limited [2015] EWFC 5 reiterates the principles of costs against third parties. The judgment contains a detailed review of the law relating to cost liability…
CHILDREN CASES AND THE RECOVERY OF A SUCCESS FEE: CHANGES COMING INTO FORCE ON APRIL 6th
Amidst all the changes to Part 36 it is easy to miss the fact that changes in relation to children cases on the 6th April 2015. In essence this provides a mechanism for the court to consider the deduction of…
WITNESS CREDIBILITY: WHAT FACTORS DOES THE COURT LOOK AT? ANOTHER EXAMPLE FROM THE MERCANTILE COURT
The case of Excelerate Technology Ltd -v- Cumberbatch [2015] EWHC B1 Mercantile was looked at in an earlier post in relation to the judge’s observations about the costs budget*. It did, however, contain important observations about the way in which judges assess…
THE MITCHELL CASE AND COSTS: IN THE NEWS AGAIN
My apologies for relying on a non-legal source. However the BBC reports that Mr Mitchell has been ordered to pay both sets of costs in the defamation action. THE CASE BBC News reports a decision of Mr Justice Mitting that…
LATE SERVICE OF WITNESS STATEMENTS AND RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS IN THE HIGH COURT
In Devon & Cornwall Autistic Community Trust -v- Cornwall Council [2015] EWHC 129 (QB) the claimant’s application for the adjournment of the trial date was refused. However the claimant was given permission to serve witness statements late. Mr Justice Green…
SUMMARY JUDGMENT: CONDITIONAL LEAVE TO DEFEND NOT A RUNNER-UP PRIZE: A BARRIER TO THE FLOODGATES ARGUMENT?
In Global Flood Defence Systems Ltd -v- Van Den Noort Innovations BV [2015] EWHC 153 (IPEC) HH Judge Hacon made it clear that a court would only make an order giving conditional leave to defend in limited circumstances. THE CASE…
You must be logged in to post a comment.